AI Rate Professor

Economics

Ravjit Singh

ECON002 · ECON01 · ECON203Z · ECON1 · ECON2 · ECON001 · ECONOMY2 · ECON02 · 135 lifetime ratings

AI rating
93/100
RMP rating
4.1/5
Take again
83.87%
Difficulty
2.1

The decision

if you want a fair economics class where steady note-taking and .

Best fit · Effort For RewardExtra Credit HeavyClear Study GuidesCaring TeacherEasy A With NotesLecture Dependent
  • Most students , and .
  • Grades are very forgiving because of , and .
  • The main drawback is lecture dependence, with some students finding her chatty, confusing, or workload-heavy in online summer sections.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

88/100

Getting an A is very realistic if students take lecture notes, finish homework, use study guides, and collect .

Online evidence is more split because one summer review reports heavy busywork, while with attendance and notes.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

76/100

The economics content is usually described as introductory and manageable, though lecture pace and written midterms can make it harder for some students.

Online reviews call the class easy but sometimes busy, while students attend and follow lecture notes.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

, but many in-person students say showing up and taking notes is important.

Online attendance evidence is mixed, while and exam success.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

86/100

Students mostly recommend Singh because , and makes high grades reachable.

Both formats include strong recommendations, but online has more complaints about workload and confusion.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

89/100

is frequent, grading is forgiving, and several students report grade boosts or A-range outcomes after early struggles.

Format shift

Both formats mention , while in-person reviews give stronger evidence of grade bumps and .

Workload

Moderate

61/100

The workload usually includes , but many students still call it manageable.

Format shift

Online summer reviews show the heaviest workload complaints, while or manageable.

Teaching experience

Good

84/100

Most students describe Singh as , and engaging, but a noticeable minority find her lectures confusing or too chatty.

Format shift

Recent online and in-person reviews are strongly positive, while complaints.

Assessment method

Balanced

56/100

Assessment mixes , and rather than relying only on exams.

Format shift

Online reviews mention quizzes, forums, homework, and finals, while in-person reviews , and finals.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

42 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person , and manageable grading, with some older complaints about confusing lectures.

Main concern

You usually need to attend lecture and .

What students said

“ and she throws in a lot of humor and relevant information.”
ECON002
“The workload is low while you can still learn a lot.”
ECON2
“Her style of teaching is everywhere.”
ECON2

Remote format

Online

8 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

Online reviews are mostly very positive, but one summer section complained about heavy busywork and .

Main concern

Online summer workload can feel writing-heavy and repetitive.

What students said

“Light work load.”
ECON001
“The quizzes and .”
ECON1
“ so much writing.”
ECON001

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are usually student-friendly because reviews mention study guides, notes or cheat sheets, , and predictable lecture-based material.

Study GuidesExtra CreditNotes AllowedMultiple Choice QuizzesNon-Cumulative Final

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

82/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews clearly support notes or cheat sheets, study guides, multiple choice quizzes, written midterms, and non-cumulative finals, but not a .

Notes AllowedCheat PapersStudy GuidesWritten MidtermNon-Cumulative Final
“You can use notes on the midterm and ”
ECON02
“ .”
ECON2
“ .”
ECON001

Online

Online reviews clearly support easy quizzes and , but they do not clearly prove proctoring, webcam, Lockdown Browser, open-book, or take-home policies.

Study GuidesEasy QuizzesLecture Slide Based Exams
“the .”
ECON001
“Her quizzes and .”
ECON1
“The quizzes and .”
ECON1

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Probably the .”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and support. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

84/100

“ and she throws in a lot of humor and relevant information.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

86/100

“Prof Singh IS ONE OF THE . ...ZERO HESITATION.”

⚖️

89/100

“When I was on the edge of getting an A-, with an 89, she bumped me up with a few remaining extra credits.”

📚 Workload Reality

61/100

“Purchase Cengage to do weekly hw.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • AMAZING teacher.
  • and she throws in a lot of humor and relevant information.
  • .
  • Her style of teaching is everywhere.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Easy A as long as you are a decent student.
  • TONS of opportunities.
  • The workload is low while you can still learn a lot.
  • You need to study hard to get an A.

Theme 3

📝

  • The study guide and .
  • You can use notes on the midterm and
  • .
  • The quizzes and .

Theme 4

❤️ About Support

  • She cares a ton about individual success and goes out of her way to help students.
  • Really engaging lectures, she tries to make them as fun as possible.
  • She helps you a lot in her office hours.
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

135

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

The analysis is based on 50 reviews across many years, with strong detail and and teaching patterns despite some older negative outliers.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 565
4 out of 547
3 out of 512
2 out of 57
1 out of 54

Course coverage

ECON113 reviews
ECON211 reviews
ECON00110 reviews
ECON026 reviews
ECON014 reviews
Show 4 more courses
ECON0023 reviews
006371 review
ECON203Z1 review
ECONOMY21 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

34 reported outcomes

A range

32

A+ 25 · A 5 · A- 2

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1