AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Sadeghi Hassanv

MATH0010 · MATH114 · MATH22 · MATH01523 · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
6/100
RMP rating
1.6/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

unless you can learn the material mostly on your own.

Best fit · Self Taught ProTough GraderLecture HeavyLots of HomeworkUnclear TeachingSelf-Study Required
  • Students consistently criticize the teaching as .
  • Grades and tests feel difficult because , and .
  • The online review is also negative and says the course lacks personal connection and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Getting an A looks hard because students report , and low grades.

The online review reports a D and weak teaching, while and outside-tutor dependence.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

30/100

The math content becomes harder because , and disconnected from tests or textbook examples.

Both formats suggest the course is , with .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

not mandatory and one in-person review marking it mandatory.

The , while in-person evidence varies.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

8/100

because they find the , and hard to use for learning.

Both online and in-person reviews are negative, with .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

20/100

Grading appears harsh because , and weak grade outcomes.

Format shift

, while the online review also shows a poor outcome.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Workload is heavy in recent in-person evidence because one student says .

Format shift

The online workload is not clearly proven, while .

Teaching experience

Awful

18/100

Teaching quality is very low because students describe lectures as quiet, fast, boring, copied, and ineffective.

Format shift

Both formats are negative, but .

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

, and tests, so the method appears mixed rather than purely exam-based.

Format shift

and tests, while the online review does not clearly describe assessment structure.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews criticize , and too much homework.

Main concern

Students often need outside help or .

What students said

“I did most of my learning outside class with an individual tutor or I wouldn't have passed.”
MATH114
“Didn't teach at all.”
MATH22

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The online review says the class felt impersonal and the teaching style did not match the textbook.

Main concern

The online class appears without strong independent learning.

What students said

“You show up, listen to him talk about Statistics in his way of teaching it which is very different from the textbook.”
MATH01523

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam policy is inconsistent because one old in-person review says tests are open note, but other reviews emphasize unclear or .

Open Note In One ReviewUnclear TestsHard Test Wording

Assessment risk

Varies

42/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person evidence includes one open-note test comment and .

Open Note In One ReviewUnclear TestsHard Test Wording
“The .”
MATH0010
“The any problem in the book.”
MATH0010

Online

The online review does not clearly .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I did most of my learning outside class with an individual tutor or I wouldn't have passed.”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

18/100

“Didn't teach at all.”

👎 Recommendation Rate

8/100

“One of the .”

⚖️

20/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • His voice is always too quiet, he reads straight from an .
  • Lectures too fast. .
  • Boring lectures, read off a powerpoint that was a clearly just copied and pasted from the book.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • had to pay $70 to do hw from some website where .
  • and test.
  • and lecture are completely different .

Theme 3

🧍

  • If you want learn by yourself or from the book, this is the professor to take.
  • I did most of my learning outside class with an individual tutor or I wouldn't have passed.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is medium because only 5 reviews are available, but the negative teaching pattern is consistent across years.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 53
1 out of 52

Course coverage

MATH00102 reviews
MATH015231 review
MATH1141 review
MATH221 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

2

B 1 · B- 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

1

D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values