AI Rate Professor

English

Vivian Bejarin

EWRT211WRITING · EWRT2 · D211 · ERWT211 · EWRT211 · ENGLID001 · EWRT1A · 61 lifetime ratings

AI rating
64/100
RMP rating
3.4/5
Take again
61.9%
Difficulty
2.3

The decision

Take Vivian Bejarin if you want a and can handle vague instructions by asking for help early.

Best fit · Effort For RewardHelpful FeedbackExtra CreditTough GraderUnclear InstructionsParticipation Matters
  • Students , and .
  • The , and tough essay grading.
  • Grades can be good, but students usually need to ask questions and keep up with writing work.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

72/100

Many students report A or A+ grades through and revisions, but the A , and clarification.

The evidence is mostly in person, while online evidence is too limited and more mixed.

Is the course easy?

Standard

56/100

The writing content is not conceptually extreme, but , and vague prompts make it feel harder.

workload swings, while online reviews emphasize confusion more than content difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

Attendance is sometimes mandatory and participation often affects points, but .

, while in-person reviews range from mandatory to optional.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

62/100

and support, but repeated complaints about clarity keep the recommendation moderate.

In-person reviews are broad and mixed, while online reviews are sparse and include a strong negative warning.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

48/100

and revisions help, but many students call her a tough grader and warn that .

Format shift

, while online grading evidence is limited.

Workload

Moderate

52/100

The , and participation, with some students calling it manageable and others heavy.

Format shift

and weekly reflections often, while online reviews do not give enough consistent workload detail.

Teaching experience

Average

62/100

She is often described as caring and helpful one-on-one, but many students say lectures and .

Format shift

In-person evidence is highly mixed, while online evidence is too small and polarized.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

22/100

Grades appear driven mainly by essays, reflections, participation, revisions, and .

Format shift

Both formats focus on writing assignments, with .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

47 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

teaching and repeated complaints about unclear directions and tough grading.

Main concern

The biggest concern is losing points because .

What students said

“ , and her class vibe is relaxed.”
EWRT1A
“She also takes no late work so if you struggle with that .”
EWRT1A
“ if you want to be uninformed and .”
EWRT211

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are limited and mixed, with one strong warning about books and and office hours.

Main concern

Online students and manage materials independently.

What students said

“Take someone .”
EWRT1A
“Office hours office hours office hours. She was open to it all.”
EWRT2

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mainly describe essays and finals, but they do not clearly prove a .

Essay-Based FinalRevision OpportunitiesUnclear Exam Evidence

Assessment risk

Varies

62/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews describe essay finals and , but not a clear exam policy.

Essay FinalExtra Credit Can Reduce Final Pressure
“It was 4 papers total (3 required + 1 final), but there were tones of offered that I didn't even have to do the final.”
EWRT2
“ without having to do the final.”
EWRT1A

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Professor Vivian is one of the greatest instructors I've ever met. She is easy to approach, very inspiring and kind, and knowledgeable.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and clarity. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

62/100

“She is easy to approach, very inspiring and kind, and knowledgeable.”

⚖️

48/100

“Shes a kind professor yet a . You just gotta work more to gain more.”

📌 Clarity Risk

45/100

“ and so confusing. and how to do them.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She not only tries to help you get better at writing she cares for you as a person.
  • She will not hesitate to help you if you put effort to each of your work.
  • She teachers the structure required in essays but often times is vague about certain things so you will have to ask questions.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • a lot of extra and you'll pass
  • Laziness is the only excuse to get a bad grade.
  • This teacher is useless. She teaches nothing about writing skills.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

61

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

The judgment is based on 50 reviews across many years with consistent themes , and grading.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 523
4 out of 513
3 out of 58
2 out of 59
1 out of 58

Course coverage

EWRT1A20 reviews
EWRT21116 reviews
ERWT2115 reviews
EWRT25 reviews
D2112 reviews
Show 2 more courses
ENGLID0011 review
EWRT211WRITING1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

29 reported outcomes

A range

16

A+ 9 · A 7

B range

2

B+ 1 · B 1

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

10

Drop/Withdrawal 2 · Not sure yet 2 · Not_Sure_Yet 1 · Pass 4 · Rather not say 1