AI Rate Professor

English

lauren gordon

EWRT1A · 14 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
2.0/5
Take again
28.57%
Difficulty
4.2

The decision

Avoid this class unless you are comfortable with , and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough graderHeavy writingSlow gradingUnclear directionsCaring but uneven
  • Most in-person , and strict grading.
  • Positive , and lenient with some assignments, but they are outnumbered.
  • The grade risk is high because many students report low grades, lots of work, and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

18/100

Getting an A looks difficult because most reviews , and several low grades.

The only online review gives limited evidence of late-work leniency, while .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

The course content may be standard English writing, but and .

because online evidence has only one short review.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

, and participation appears to matter in class.

The single online review also marks attendance mandatory, so .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

30/100

Most students do not recommend the class because of , and .

, while the lone online review is too limited to offset them.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

20/100

Repeated tough-grader tags, low grades, and .

Format shift

In-person evidence is harsh, while the only online review mentions leniency only for late assignments.

Workload

Overwhelming

15/100

Students repeatedly mention lots of , and too much work in too little time.

Format shift

Both formats mention lots of work, but .

Teaching experience

Poor

28/100

Some students call her caring, but , and slow grading.

Format shift

In-person reviews are mostly poor, while the only online review gives no real teaching-quality detail.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

, and participation rather than exams.

Format shift

and assignments, while online evidence only signals homework and reading.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

13 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews are mostly negative, with repeated , and weak feedback.

Main concern

Students repeatedly describe the class as overloaded and hard to navigate.

What students said

“She expects a lot from you, she think you already know the format and techniques and gives very little directions, asks you to write a lot of essays and ”
EWRT1A
“somehow managed to waste every little moment in physical class instead of letting us work on her copious amounts of work.”
EWRT1A
“She will try to help you to participate sharing your ideas even if it's something little.”
EWRT1A

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

The only online review says the class has lots of work but .

Main concern

Online evidence is too thin to judge the full course experience.

What students said

“She's very lenient with late assignments.”
EWRT1A

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam policy is unclear because some comments say only essays while .

EssaysNo Tests Or Quizzes ReportedTest Heavy Tag AppearsReviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy

Assessment risk

Varies

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and papers, but do not clearly prove a .

Only EssaysMany PapersTest Heavy Tag Appears
“ ”
EWRT1A
“asks you to write a lot of essays and ”
EWRT1A
“somehow managed to waste every little moment in physical class instead of letting us work on her copious amounts of work.”
EWRT1A

Online

The single online review .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She expects a lot from you, she think you already know the format and techniques and gives very little directions, asks you to write a lot of essays and ”

Voice snapshots generated from 14 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

28/100

“Shes a good person but she is not a good teacher.”

📚 Workload

15/100

“somehow managed to waste every little moment in physical class instead of letting us work on her copious amounts of work.”

⚖️

20/100

“she takes her sweet time and when she does, she as well.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Shes a good person but she is not a good teacher.
  • She will try to help you to participate sharing your ideas even if it's something little.
  • however, she isn't the

Theme 2

📝 About Writing Load

  • asks you to write a lot of essays and
  • The if you really pay attention.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Risk

  • dont...
  • It is indescribably terrible.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

14

Recent reviews read by the AI

14

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

There are 14 reviews with consistent negative themes, but several are very short or vague and only one online review exists.

Inside 14 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 59

Course coverage

EWRT1A14 reviews

Reported outcomes

D range results lead the reported letter grades.

13 reported outcomes

A range

2

A+ 1 · A 1

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

1

C 1

D range

4

D+ 1 · D- 3

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

4

Not sure yet 3 · Rather not say 1