AI Rate Professor

De Anza College · Physical Education

Jovanah Arrington

Courses not reported · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
48/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

if you want support, but be cautious about the online workload.

Best fit · Effort For RewardFlexible In PersonHeavy Online WorkReading BasedMixed Experience
  • , but online feedback is strongly negative.
  • The course appears reading-heavy, with workload changing sharply by format.
  • but much harder online.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

60/100

An A looks realistic in person with flexibility and , but the online section looks much harder and more work-heavy.

In-person evidence supports an easier A, while .

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

The and becomes harder when paired with lots of and papers.

, while online feedback makes it sound difficult.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

but mandatory in the online review.

The two .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

50/100

Recommendation depends heavily on format because one review is very positive and the other is very negative.

In-person evidence is favorable, while online evidence is not.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

and an A in , but the online B and high difficulty prevent calling it lenient.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

35/100

The online tags report lots of homework and so many papers, while the based.

Format shift

Online workload .

Teaching experience

Average

55/100

The in-person review praises her support, but the online review gives the lowest quality rating with no useful positive detail.

Format shift

Teaching experience is strongly positive in person and strongly negative online.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Comments and , and group projects than exams.

Format shift

Both formats mainly show assignment-based evidence, with online emphasizing papers and homework.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

The helps students do well.

Main concern

The class is still reading based.

What students said

“Reading based class but she is flexible and will work with you to help you do well in the class!”
45427

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

The online review reports a .

Main concern

, and .

What students said

“d”
45427

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The reviews do not clearly prove the .

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The policy.

Online

The online review does not clearly prove the .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Reading based class but she is flexible and will work with you to help you do well in the class!”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting format differences in support and workload. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

55/100

“Reading based class but she is flexible and will work with you to help you do well in the class!”

📚 Workload Risk

35/100

“d”

👍 Recommendation Split

50/100

“Reading based class but she is flexible and will work with you to help you do well in the class!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Support

  • Reading based class but she is flexible and will work with you to help you do well in the class!
  • We covered some super interesting topics

Theme 2

📚 About Workload

  • d

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

35/100

Evidence confidence

Only two reviews exist, and the two formats strongly disagree.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

454272 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values