AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Salvador Guerrero

CAL1B · MATH1C · MATH1A · MATH2B · MATHD022 · 1A · MATH32 · MATH1B · MATH1D · DO31 · MATH22 · MATH41 · MATH1B1C · MATH12 · D031 · 75 lifetime ratings

AI rating
47/100
RMP rating
3.1/5
Take again
52.05%
Difficulty
3.8

The decision

if , and tolerate a tough grader with uneven teaching.

Best fit · Self Taught ProTough grader with correctionsSelf-study heavyTest heavyPolarizing teaching styleLenient second chances
  • Students often and resubmissions, but the work still takes real effort.
  • Many reviews say lectures are unclear, disorganized, or .
  • Online reviews are harsher than in-person reviews, especially about Zoom lectures, video quality, and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

An A is realistic because , and makeups exist, but students repeatedly say you must work hard and self-study.

Online evidence stresses hard weekly exams and self-study, while and grade recovery.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

The math content is made harder by unclear lectures, fast pacing, proof-heavy work, and difficult exams.

Online reviews describe more self-teaching and technical issues, while and .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

35/100

participation, but some sections report optional attendance.

Online reviews more often list mandatory Zoom attendance, while and optional.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

52/100

and persistence, but many warn against him because of unclear teaching and .

Online reviews are more negative overall, while .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

45/100

He is often called a , but , and resubmissions can recover many points.

Format shift

and corrections, with online students more frustrated by delayed or .

Workload

Heavy

30/100

Students frequently mention lots of , and long hours of self-study.

Format shift

Online workload is described as reading-heavy and exam-heavy, while .

Teaching experience

Average

48/100

He can be caring and helpful for persistent students, but many reviews .

Format shift

Online teaching complaints are stronger, especially about Zoom quality and self-study, while .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

Grades are repeatedly described as driven by exams, quizzes, finals, and .

Format shift

Online reviews mention weekly exams and high exam weight, while and tough quizzes.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

23 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are split between caring second chances and , and .

Main concern

, but the course can feel hard and poorly explained.

What students said

“Easy A if you put in some effort!”
MATH12
“the textbook is more ”
MATH1D

Remote format

Online

27 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online students often report , and mixed help from corrections.

Main concern

Online lectures are often described as .

What students said

“Expect to teach yourself literally everything from the textbook or online”
MATH1B
“ , and the class is just overall very disorganized.”
MATH22

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are often hard, but corrections, resubmissions, take-home finals, or .

Weekly ExamsTest CorrectionsTake-Home FinalFinal PreviewTough Exams

Assessment risk

Varies

62/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and possible early final access, but they do not clearly prove closed-book or proctored exam rules.

Tough TestsExam CorrectionsCurvesFinal Exam Preview
“Tests/quizzes are based on lecture examples & you can get A LOT of .”
MATH12
“You can also take a copy of the .”
MATH1B1C

Online

Online reviews , and one no-clear-proctoring final, but they do not clearly prove webcam or Lockdown Browser rules.

Weekly ExamsTake-Home TestsExam CorrectionsHome-Taken Final
“ ”
MATH1C
“the ”
CAL1B

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If .”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and course format. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

48/100

“He doesn't teach at all.”

⚖️

45/100

“Definitely a , but if you put in the work, you will get an A.”

📈 Grade Recovery

58/100

“ want.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • It's basically a self-study class and has zoom meetings for questions.
  • His lectures are very unhelpful, only going over a few example problems and never really explaining any concepts.
  • He is a decent teacher and gives a chance to fix your mistakes on the test.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Not an easy A but if you are willing to work for it he will help you get there unless you cheat, cheaters dropped a letter grade.
  • It's an easy A if you do the assignment.
  • If you want an Easy A or show up to .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

75

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

The judgment is based on 50 reviews across online and in-person formats with , and self-study.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 523
4 out of 510
3 out of 513
2 out of 57
1 out of 522

Course coverage

MATH129 reviews
MATH1C8 reviews
MATH228 reviews
MATH1B5 reviews
CAL1B3 reviews
Show 10 more courses
MATH1A3 reviews
D0312 reviews
MATH2B2 reviews
MATH322 reviews
MATH412 reviews
MATHD0222 reviews
1A1 review
DO311 review
MATH1B1C1 review
MATH1D1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

46 reported outcomes

A range

22

A+ 3 · A 16 · A- 3

B range

7

B+ 2 · B 4 · B- 1

C range

2

C+ 1 · C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

15

Drop/Withdrawal 2 · Not sure yet 7 · Rather not say 6