AI Rate Professor

English

Kim Huynh

EWRT1 · EWRTD001 · 7 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
2.3/5
Take again
25%
Difficulty
2.4

The decision

unless you can handle heavy writing work with little teaching support.

Best fit · Self Taught ProHeavy HomeworkToo Many PapersConfusing TeachingTough GradingHelpful Feedback In Older Reviews
  • Recent reviews are strongly negative and repeatedly warn about heavy daily work.
  • Students report many readings, papers, and .
  • and communication, but they are outweighed by newer complaints.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

50/100

Some students earned A grades, but comments say the A costs a lot of , and constant assignments.

Online evidence is harsher and includes a C+ grade, while in person evidence includes A grades but heavy work complaints.

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

The material is not described as deeply complex, but the and large writing load make the course feel harder.

as the main difficulty, with online comments stressing short deadlines.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

marked mandatory and others not mandatory.

The , while in person reviews are split between mandatory and not mandatory.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

25/100

Most recent students strongly because of poor teaching and .

The only online review is negative, and most recent in person reviews are also negative despite two older positive reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

35/100

Grades can be high, but and complaints about expectations suggest .

Format shift

Online evidence is stricter with a C+ and , while in person evidence mixes A grades with .

Workload

Overwhelming

15/100

Students repeatedly mention daily assignments, lots of , and .

Format shift

Both formats describe heavy workload, with online evidence specifically saying 4-5 assignments per week.

Teaching experience

Poor

30/100

Recent comments describe confusing instruction and little learning value, while .

Format shift

Online evidence is negative, and in person evidence is mostly negative in recent reviews but positive in older ones.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

Reviews focus heavily on readings, essays, papers, and .

Format shift

Both formats emphasize assignments and writing work, with .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

7 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In person reviews are mostly negative, with , and too many papers.

Main concern

Heavy workload with poor learning value.

What students said

“ and you literally dont learn anything from this teacher.”
EWRTD001
“Stay away from this class, bad way of teaching and LOTS of assignments everyday.”
EWRT1
“She just throw a lot of and and lost.”
EWRTD001

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The online review describes a heavy writing and and short deadlines.

Main concern

Too much work in too little time.

What students said

“4-5 assignments a week are given in this class.”
EWRT1
“It's just a ton of work given in so little time, with really high expectations.”
EWRT1

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the exam style.

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The in person reviews do not clearly prove exam .

Online

The online review does not clearly prove exam .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ and you literally dont learn anything from this teacher.”

Voice snapshots generated from 8 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

30/100

“ and you literally dont learn anything from this teacher.”

📚 Workload Pressure

15/100

“SHE THINKS THIS IS THE ONLY CLASS THAT AND JUST THROW HOMEWORKS EVERY SINGLE DAY.”

⚖️

35/100

“This class isn't for you if and analyzing texts.”

Theme 1

📚 About Workload

  • LOTS of assignments everyday.
  • 4-5 assignments a week are given in this class.
  • She just throw a lot of and and lost.

Theme 2

🎯 About Teaching Style

  • bad way of teaching
  • the material she teaches is completely useless to improve writing
  • Easy work and shes good with communication.

Theme 3

❤️ About Support

  • She really wants her students to succeed !!
  • she genuinely cares!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

8

Recent reviews read by the AI

7

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Eight reviews across multiple years give consistent recent evidence about workload and teaching problems, though older reviews are more positive.

Inside 8 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 55

Course coverage

EWRT15 reviews
EWRTD0013 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

6 reported outcomes

A range

4

A 2 · A- 2

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values