AI Rate Professor

Computer Information Systems

Alexander Morgan Jr

CIS03 · CISD00301Y · 7 lifetime ratings

AI rating
30/100
RMP rating
2.3/5
Take again
42.86%
Difficulty
2.9

The decision

boost, not for clear teaching or strong learning.

Best fit · Easy A HunterUnclear InstructionsTough File RulesExtra CreditEasy Grades PossibleLow Teaching Support
  • Students often get high grades, but many say the class is frustrating because .
  • and resubmissions help grades, but and arbitrary.
  • Learning value is inconsistent, with several comments saying the class is easy but not useful.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

72/100

High grades and make an A realistic, but and strict file rules keep it from being effortless.

Online reviews include the clearest easy-A evidence, while in person reviews show more effort and participation concerns.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

The course content is often described as easy, but poor organization makes simple tasks frustrating.

Both formats suggest the content is manageable, with online reviews more critical of disorganization.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

70/100

Online reviews and some in , but older in person reviews mark it mandatory.

Online evidence supports flexibility, while in person and .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

35/100

Students warn against him because unclear instructions, weak help, and .

Online reviews lean negative despite easy grades, while in person reviews are more mixed because of and one strong learning outcome.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

and resubmissions help, but strict file naming and .

Format shift

Online evidence shows both perfect grades and harsh penalties, while in person evidence repeatedly mentions .

Workload

Moderate

45/100

Work is not always intellectually hard, but , and unclear.

Format shift

Online reviews call assignments long and tedious, while in person reviews focus more on clarification and effort.

Teaching experience

Poor

35/100

Multiple students say , and learning value is weak.

Format shift

Online evidence is mostly negative, while in person evidence ranges from poor clarity to useful learning.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

, and tests, so assessment appears mixed rather than purely exam-based.

Format shift

Online and in person reviews both mention assignment-heavy work, while .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In person reviews are mixed, with and some useful learning but and tough grading details.

Main concern

.

What students said

“the directions for and dont make much sense.”
CISD00301Y
“I had to work really hard for my grade in this class but I find myself using what I learned here OFTEN!!”
CISD00301Y
“chill class.”
CIS03

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

Online reviews describe easy grade potential but , and .

Main concern

and .

What students said

“Easy A, but at times frustrating because of , and I didn't learn anything new.”
CISD00301Y
“ and his assignments are just long and tedious with no engaging content.”
CIS03
“I received a B because I got 2 points off the final.”
CIS03

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention tests and a final, but they do not clearly prove proctoring, open-book rules, webcam rules, or .

Final MentionedTests Based On Homework And Projects

Assessment risk

Varies

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In person reviews say tests are based on homework and projects, but do .

Tests Based On Homework And Projects
“ and projects.”
CIS03

Online

Online reviews mention a final score affecting the grade but do not clearly .

Final Mentioned
“I received a B because I got 2 points off the final.”
CIS03

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Easy A, but at times frustrating because of , and I didn't learn anything new.”

Voice snapshots generated from 7 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and learning value. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

35/100

“ and his assignments are just long and tedious with no engaging content.”

📈 Grade Path

72/100

“Super easy class, but .”

⚖️

55/100

“To get an A in the class you must get 95%. However, he gives lots of opportunities for .”

Theme 1

🧭 About Clarity

  • the directions for and dont make much sense.

Theme 2

📈 About Grades

  • Super easy class
  • Easy A
  • he gives lots of opportunities for .

Theme 3

🎯 About Learning Value

  • I didn't learn anything new.
  • If you care about learning .
  • I find myself using what I learned here OFTEN!!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

7

Recent reviews read by the AI

7

Lifetime ratings

70/100

Evidence confidence

Seven reviews across several years show a consistent pattern of , but opinions are mixed and some evidence is old.

Inside 7 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 53

Course coverage

CIS034 reviews
CISD00301Y3 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

7 reported outcomes

A range

5

A+ 3 · A 1 · A- 1

B range

2

B+ 1 · B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values