AI Rate Professor

English As A Second Language

Daniel Tung

ESL251 · ESL005 · ESL465 · ESL200 · ESL273 · 19 lifetime ratings

AI rating
98/100
RMP rating
4.7/5
Take again
94.74%
Difficulty
2.5

The decision

Strongly recommended, especially for ESL students who , and a supportive instructor.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyClear LecturesCaring TeacherGenerous GradingOrganized NotesBeginner Friendly
  • Students overwhelmingly praise his clarity, organization, patience, and respect for students.
  • Grades are usually favorable, especially when students complete essays, quizzes, and .
  • , but students generally see the class as valuable rather than pointless.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

86/100

A grades are common and students mention , but essays, quizzes, reading, and .

Online reviews give the strongest easy-A evidence, while in person reviews show high grades with more participation and grammar practice.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

70/100

Students say course accessible even when grammar and writing require practice.

Online evidence suggests easier passing, while in person evidence emphasizes guided learning through structured practice.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

Many in person reviews mark attendance mandatory, though some online and .

Online attendance is mixed, while in .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

95/100

Students overwhelmingly recommend him because , and .

In person evidence is extremely positive, while online evidence is mostly positive but includes one learning-value concern.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

88/100

Students report easy A , and nearly full scores on drafts.

Format shift

, while in person reviews support fairness through clear criteria and many A grades.

Workload

Moderate

62/100

The workload , and participation, but students usually find it manageable.

Format shift

Online reviews list essays and weekly quizzes, while in person reviews focus on steady class practice and reading.

Teaching experience

Excellent

94/100

Reviews consistently praise his clear explanations, organized notes, patience, respect, and .

Format shift

In person evidence is deeply positive and detailed, while online evidence is mostly positive with .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

Assessment evidence centers on essays, journals, reading quizzes, homework, participation, and .

Format shift

Online evidence directly lists essays, journals, and quizzes, while in , and participation.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

16 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In person reviews strongly , and useful ESL guidance.

Main concern

and the class can require steady participation.

What students said

“He is the .”
ESL273
“he is friendly and patient.”
ESL200
“He always motivates us to think critically.”
ESL273

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

and easy passing, though one student says feedback was weak for learning writing.

Main concern

Online learning value may vary if the .

What students said

“easy A.”
ESL005
“Professor Tung grades very generously.”
ESL005
“If you just wanna pass the .”
ESL273

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention weekly quizzes, but they do not clearly prove exam proctoring, .

Weekly Quiz Mentioned

Assessment risk

Standard

60/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In person reviews do not clearly prove exam policy, proctoring, open-book rules, midterm format, or .

Online

, but do not clearly prove webcam use, proctoring, open-book rules, midterm format, or .

Weekly Quiz Mentioned
“1 quiz/ week about a book which I only watch the summary on youtube.”
ESL005
“each week will have a .”
ESL005

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“He is the . He speaks clearly, and !”

Voice snapshots generated from 19 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

94/100

“He is the . He speaks clearly, and !”

👍 Recommendation Rate

95/100

“ enjoy learning English skills, particularly grammar, speaking, and listening.”

⚖️

88/100

“Professor Tung grades very generously.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • .
  • .
  • he is friendly and patient.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • easy A.
  • Professor Tung grades very generously.
  • If you listen to his class and .

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • He always motivates us to think critically.
  • He always replied emails with respects.
  • he genuinely cares!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

19

Recent reviews read by the AI

19

Lifetime ratings

95/100

Evidence confidence

Nineteen reviews over many years are highly consistent, detailed, and strongly positive, with only a small online learning-value dissent.

Inside 19 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 517
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ESL27311 reviews
ESL0052 reviews
ESL2002 reviews
ESL2512 reviews
ESL4652 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

14 reported outcomes

A range

11

A+ 5 · A 5 · A- 1

B range

2

B+ 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1