AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

George Krestas

MATH1A · MATH21 · MATHD041 · MATH041 · DO42 · D042 · MATH043 · MATH43 · CIS15E37 · MATH031 · MATH41 · MATH42 · MATH130 · MATH042 · PRECALCALUS3 · 263 lifetime ratings

AI rating
3/100
RMP rating
2.0/5
Take again
9.43%
Difficulty
3.9

The decision

Avoid George Krestas unless you are already strong in math and can survive with .

Best fit · Self Taught ProAvoid at all costsPowerPoint lecturesTough gradingPop quizzesStrict attendance
  • Most reviews , and heavy reliance on slides.
  • Students report , and harsh or confusing grading rules.
  • Some students still earn high grades through self-study, , or outside help, but recommendation is extremely low.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

Some students get A grades, but they usually rely on self-study, strong math skills, , or and quizzes.

Online reviews include withdrawals and strict participation, while in person reviews show occasional high grades mixed with and .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

25/100

The math may be manageable for strong students, but , and unpredictable assessments make it challenging.

Both formats describe unclear teaching, with in person reviews giving more evidence of , and .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

10/100

and comments describe pop quizzes, participation rules, locked doors, or camera requirements.

Online reviews mention camera and participation enforcement, while in , and strict classroom rules.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

10/100

Students overwhelmingly warn against taking him because , and .

Both online and in person reviews are strongly negative, with only a few isolated positive comments.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

15/100

Students repeatedly call him a tough grader and , and unforgiving test grading.

Format shift

Online reviews cite computerized or , while in person and pop quizzes.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

, and outside self-study because lectures are not enough.

Format shift

Online reviews add participation pressure, while in , and .

Teaching experience

Awful

15/100

Most students say he reads from PowerPoint, explains poorly, answers questions badly, and forces students to learn elsewhere.

Format shift

Online and in person reviews both describe unclear teaching, with in person reviews showing a longer repeated pattern.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

82/100

Assessment is heavily driven by quizzes, pop quizzes, midterms, tests, and .

Format shift

Online reviews mention WebAssign, quizzes, and tests; in person , and finals.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

41 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In person reviews are overwhelmingly negative, with repeated complaints , and difficult exams.

Main concern

Students and tests or .

What students said

“Death by PowerPoint!!! This guy doesnt even teach and .”
MATH042
“This is probably the .”
MATH41
“Avoid if possible!”
MATH41

Remote format

Online

9 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are strongly negative, citing mandatory participation, camera or face rules, , and .

Main concern

Online students report harsh participation rules and little useful support.

What students said

“Webassign course is designed to make you fail.”
MATH031
“kicks you out of zoom if your camera isnt on or if your whole face isn't showing”
MATH031
“ and .”
MATH43

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam conditions vary, but the overall risk is high because , and only occasional take-home or cheat-sheet relief.

Pop QuizzesTest HeavyStrict ParticipationCamera Requirement EvidenceOccasional Take-Home Evidence

Assessment risk

Varies

30/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In , and occasional take-home exams, but policies are inconsistent by section.

Pop QuizzesTest HeavyCheat Sheet EvidenceOccasional Take-Home Exam
“lets you use a cheat sheet for tests and notes for quizzes.”
MATH043
“he gave out the exam and we can do it at home (sometimes).”
MATH043
“the lessons are pretty easy but on the tests and quizzes he makes them 100 times harder.”
MATH041

Online

Online reviews explicitly mention camera or , and tests, but do not clearly prove Lockdown Browser or .

Camera Requirement EvidencePop TestsWebAssign Final Grades
“kicks you out of zoom if your camera isnt on or if your whole face isn't showing”
MATH031
“ while he sleeps”
MATH031
“ ”
MATH031

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Death by PowerPoint!!! This guy doesnt even teach and .”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting , and repeated avoidance warnings. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

15/100

“Death by PowerPoint!!! This guy doesnt even teach and .”

⚠️ Recommendation Risk

10/100

“Avoid if possible!”

🧪 Exam And

30/100

“the lessons are pretty easy but on the tests and quizzes he makes them 100 times harder.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He teaches mostly through slides with .
  • He's never actually teaching he just reads off of slides
  • He cannot teach.

Theme 2

🧪 About Exams And Quizzes

  • There are 3 exams and he doesn't send you any study guides.
  • the lessons are pretty easy but on the tests and quizzes he makes them 100 times harder.
  • , but never wants to go over them, students are left clueless.

Theme 3

🚫 About Student Warnings

  • Do Not make the mistake of taking this class. I'm warning you!
  • Please. if you do not want to ruin your GPA.
  • Would rather get a W then an A and stay in class.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

263

Lifetime ratings

92/100

Evidence confidence

The analysis uses 50 reviews with strong agreement across formats and years, and the negative pattern is very consistent.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 534
4 out of 517
3 out of 520
2 out of 544
1 out of 5148

Course coverage

MATH4113 reviews
Math1A7 reviews
MATH437 reviews
MATH0314 reviews
MATH0434 reviews
Show 10 more courses
MATH424 reviews
MATH0413 reviews
CIS15E371 review
D0421 review
DO421 review
MATH0421 review
MATH1301 review
MATH211 review
MATHD0411 review
PRECALCALUS31 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

36 reported outcomes

A range

8

A+ 1 · A 5 · A- 2

B range

7

B+ 3 · B 3 · B- 1

C range

2

C 2

D range

2

D 2

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

17

Drop/Withdrawal 7 · Incomplete 2 · Not sure yet 7 · Rather not say 1