Mariam Ebrat

ESL265 · COMMD007 · COMM7 · COMM07 · W21COMMD007 · COM07 · 11 lifetime ratings

AI rating: 26/100
RMP rating: 2.1/5
Take again: 36.36%
Difficulty: 3.1

The decision

Avoid unless you are comfortable self-teaching, asking for clarification often, and handling a heavy participation workload.

Best fit · Self Taught ProUnclear InstructionsHeavy HomeworkParticipation HeavyTough GradingMixed Caring Feedback

Many students complain , and weak teaching value.
Online reviews are more mixed, with some students praising care and communication.
In-person reviews are mostly negative and and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

42/100

Some students earned A grades or called it easy with readings, but heavy work, unclear expectations, and .

Online has the clearest easy-A evidence, while and .

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

The content is often described as elementary or not hard, but unclear instructions and material itself.

Online students call the material time consuming but not hard, while .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

Several reviews list mandatory attendance or heavy participation, with only .

In-person evidence is mostly mandatory, while .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

35/100

Most strong comments advise against taking her because of , and weak teaching value.

Online recommendations are mixed, but .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

Students mention , and grade damage despite some .

Format shift

Online has fair-grading praise in one review, while .

Workload

Heavy

24/100

Reviews repeatedly mention lots of homework, many papers, readings, group work, and .

Format shift

Both formats show heavy workload, with online adding group projects and .

Teaching experience

Poor

32/100

Positive comments about caring are outweighed , and self-study.

Format shift

Online reviews are polarized, while .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

The course appears , and group work rather than exams.

Format shift

Both formats emphasize assignments and participation, with .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are more negative, with students citing , and .

Main concern

Students report and .

What students said

“This class destroyed my 4.0 GPA.”
ESL265

“I don't quite understand what the teacher's contribution is to this course and .”
COM07

“I thought she was gunna be a good one in the beginning but .”
COMM07

Remote format

Online

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

and repeated complaints about unclear instructions, heavy work, and rude responses.

Main concern

Students may need to clarify vague expectations before submitting work.

What students said

“Just no. If youre thinking about taking her youre better waitlisting with another instructor.”
COM07

“The course is time consuming but not hard, the .”
COMMD007

“Just do the readings and it will be an easy A.”
COMM7

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention pop quizzes and , but they do not clearly prove a .

Pop Quizzes MentionedFinal Video Presentation MentionedPolicy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Varies

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, but comments do not clearly prove the full exam policy.

Pop Quizzes MentionedPolicy Not Clearly Proven

“Beware of pop quizzes”
ESL265

Online

Online reviews mention a , but they do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, open-book, or Lockdown Browser policy.

Final Video Presentation MentionedPolicy Not Clearly Proven

“assignments and a complex topic and an audience in hard times.”
COMMD007

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice
“I don't quite understand what the teacher's contribution is to this course and .”
Voice snapshots generated from 11 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

32/100

“She seldom teaches the content of the curriculum, and hardly talks about the things in the textbooks.”

📚 Workload Pressure

24/100

“A lot of homework.”

👍 Recommendation Level

35/100

“Just no. If youre thinking about taking her youre better waitlisting with another instructor.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

Her classes are elementary and boring.
She seldom teaches the content of the curriculum, and hardly talks about the things in the textbooks.
The class is always dull she doesnt really talk about what she has on board.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

This class destroyed my 4.0 GPA.
The course is time consuming but not hard, the .
Just do the readings and it will be an easy A.

Theme 3

❤️ About Support

She's pretty chill and just wants her students to succeed!
Ms. Ebrat really cares about her students and wants them to succeed.
You can always ask her questions and and she's really respectful in return.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

Recent reviews read by the AI

Lifetime ratings

72/100

Evidence confidence

Eleven reviews across several years give useful pattern evidence, but opinions are polarized and .

Inside 11 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51

4 out of 51

3 out of 52

2 out of 51

1 out of 56

Course coverage

COMMD0073 reviews

COM072 reviews

COMM72 reviews

ESL2652 reviews

COMM071 review

Show 1 more courses

W21COMMD0071 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

A+ 1 · A- 2

B range

B+ 1 · B 1

C range

No reported values

D range

No reported values

F

No reported values

No letter grade reported

No reported values