AI Rate Professor

De Anza College · Speech Communication

Shagun Kaur

Courses not reported · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
2.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

Avoid relying on this rating alone, but the .

Best fit · Self Taught ProRigid gradingUnclear expectationsLow supportHigh dropout risk
  • The only review is strongly negative and .
  • The and poor support for student success.
  • Credibility is low because there is only one review.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

18/100

The only student earned a C+ and describes harsh, authority-based grading with many students dropping.

All evidence comes from one online review, with no in-person evidence.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

34/100

The course sounds difficult because and the student felt grading was rigid rather than learning-focused.

All difficulty evidence comes from one online review, with no in-person evidence.

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

88/100

The review marks attendance as not mandatory, but the .

The only format evidence is online and .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

20/100

The single review is strongly negative and says the course damaged confidence and .

All recommendation evidence comes from one online review, with no in-person evidence.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

10/100

The and says students had to submit to authority or get a bad grade.

Format shift

Only one ; there is no in-person evidence.

Workload

Heavy

30/100

The review tags get ready to read and graded by few things, but does not give a full workload breakdown.

Format shift

Only online workload evidence exists, and it is limited to one review.

Teaching experience

Poor

25/100

The student describes the professor as , and unconcerned with student success.

Format shift

Only one online review exists, so the teaching judgment is low-confidence and not format-comparable.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

The review says grading was based on few things, but .

Format shift

Only one online review exists, and it does not give enough detail to map the full assessment structure.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The only online review describes a and weak student support.

Main concern

The main .

What students said

“ , and didn't care about the success of her students.”
12571
“More than half dropped the class.”
12571

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format, quiz format, open-book rules, webcam rules, Lockdown Browser, or proctoring.

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Online

The online review does not clearly prove exam format, quiz format, open-book rules, webcam rules, Lockdown Browser, or proctoring.

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ , and didn't care about the success of her students.”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 review, highlighting the and grading. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

25/100

“ , and didn't care about the success of her students.”

⚖️

10/100

“You submitted to her authority or got a bad grade.”

🚩 Course Risk

20/100

“More than half dropped the class.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • , and didn't care about the success of her students.
  • She referenced herself as "Draconian."

Theme 2

📈 About Grades & Course Risk

  • You submitted to her authority or got a bad grade.
  • More than half dropped the class.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

24/100

Evidence confidence

, so the negative signal is important but not enough for high confidence.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

125711 review

Reported outcomes

C range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values