AI Rate Professor

De Anza College · History

Michelle Fabian

HISTORY17C · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
63/100
RMP rating
3.7/5
Take again
66.67%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

if and writing, but be cautious about the in-person format.

Best fit · Effort For RewardHeavy Reading LoadStrong FeedbackExtra Credit AvailableFormat SplitFair but Demanding
  • Online reviews are strongly positive, while the .
  • The course requires a lot of reading, notes, discussions, and papers.
  • , extensions, and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

48/100

and , but the reported grades are B to B+ and students describe a lot of work.

Online evidence shows more grade support, while the .

Is the course easy?

Standard

43/100

The course does not sound conceptually impossible, but the , and .

Online students found it manageable with support, while the .

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

95/100

All three reviews report that .

Both online and .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

68/100

Two online students would take her again, but the .

, while the .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

Online students mention fair grading, , and extensions, but the .

Format shift

Online grading appears supportive, while .

Workload

Heavy

22/100

, discussions, lectures, or papers.

Format shift

Both online and .

Teaching experience

Good

72/100

Online students praise her feedback, organization, and responsiveness, but the .

Format shift

Teaching experience looks strong online but weak in the .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

Reviews mention reading assignments, notes, discussions, and .

Format shift

Both formats provide assignment-heavy evidence, and neither clearly proves an .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

The only in-person review describes the class as extremely demanding with .

Main concern

The and excessive lectures and readings.

What students said

“ .”
history17c
“She is an and assigns so many lectures and .”
history17c

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online students describe her as , and .

Main concern

The workload is .

What students said

“Even though it was a lot of work, and oppurtunities, which changed my grade from a low C to almost an A.”
history17c
“Honestly, this class was a LOT of work.”
history17c

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The reviews do not clearly prove the exam style.

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The , proctoring, quiz, midterm, or final exam policy.

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, open-book, quiz, midterm, or .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Honestly, this class was a LOT of work.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews, highlighting format differences in , and recommendation strength. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

72/100

“Prof has been a fabulous teacher.”

📚 Workload Pressure

22/100

“Honestly, this class was a LOT of work.”

⚖️

55/100

“I feel like she grades VERY fairly and well.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Professor Fabian was a great instructor.
  • she is so organized, and .
  • She answers emails quickly too.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Even though it was a lot of work, and oppurtunities, which changed my grade from a low C to almost an A.
  • I feel like she grades VERY fairly and well.
  • She is an and assigns so many lectures and .

Theme 3

📚 About Workload

  • Honestly, this class was a LOT of work.
  • We did have a good amount of and papers.
  • Additionally, you have to read the textbook, and lecture content, and of them.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

The evidence is recent and detailed, but only three reviews from one course limit reliability.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

history17c3 reviews

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

3

B+ 1 · B 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values