AI Rate Professor

Political Science

Gregory Druehl

POLI · PLISCI · POL1 · POLI01 · POLISCI · POLISCI1 · POL01 · POLI1 · POLI001 · 274 lifetime ratings

AI rating
94/100
RMP rating
4.7/5
Take again
93.33%
Difficulty
2.1

The decision

Take him if , and use , but avoid him if you want a low-attendance class.

Best fit · Effort For RewardAmazing LecturesExtra CreditLecture HeavyOpen-Note ExamsAttendance Matters
  • Students usually love his engaging, funny, and unbiased lectures, and many say they learned a lot.
  • Getting an A is realistic because of , curves, and , but attendance and notes matter.
  • The and occasional hard finals.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

An A is realistic with , and , but it is not effortless because exams can be long and lecture-heavy.

Nearly all evidence comes from in person reviews, while the single online review confirms a but .

Is the course easy?

Standard

56/100

The material is manageable but , and .

In person reviews provide the main evidence; online evidence is too limited to change the overall difficulty judgment.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

22/100

Attendance is effectively required because and students repeatedly warn that skipping class hurts grades.

In , while the single online review does not provide enough detail.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

92/100

Students strongly recommend him because his lectures are engaging, fair-minded, funny, and supported by .

In person reviews drive the recommendation score, and the one online review is also highly positive.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

78/100

Grading is favorable because students mention , curves, and clear test clues, but .

Format shift

In person reviews repeatedly mention and curves, while online evidence is too thin to judge leniency separately.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

Workload is moderate because students mention , and multiple exams.

Format shift

In person reviews show the full workload pattern, while the online review only confirms article responses and exams.

Teaching experience

Excellent

92/100

Teaching quality is excellent because students repeatedly describe him as engaging, funny, unbiased, caring, and knowledgeable.

Format shift

Both formats are positive, but the in person evidence is far stronger because it has 49 reviews.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

82/100

because reviews repeatedly mention midterms, finals, open-note exams, long multiple-choice tests, and lecture-based questions.

Format shift

The online review lists three midterms and , while in .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

49 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In person reviews describe a strong lecturer whose , and .

Main concern

, and difficult if students miss class or .

What students said

“Make sure to write down everything he says as .”
POLI01
“Aweful professor ! and main thing 139 questions in !”
POLI001
“He offers a TON of .”
POL1

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

The single online review is very positive and describes excellent lectures with , and .

Main concern

Online evidence is too limited to judge format-specific workload or .

What students said

“News Paper article responses+ 3 mid terms+ 1 Final”
POL1
“You would be foolish if !”
POL1

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are often open-note and manageable with strong notes, but they can be long, lecture-specific, and occasionally difficult.

Open-Note ExamsLecture-Based QuestionsLong Multiple-Choice ExamsExtra CreditFinal Exam Risk

Assessment risk

Standard

66/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In person reviews explicitly support open-note, lecture-based, and proctoring rules.

Open-Note ExamsLecture-Based Questions100+ Question ExamsIn-Class EssayDifficult Final
“ so write down everything he says.”
POLI1
“Exam 2 and 3 are 100 multiple choices each.”
POL01
“ ”
POLI1

Online

The single online review mentions newspaper article responses, three midterms, and , but it does not clearly prove proctoring, webcam use, or open-book rules.

Article ResponsesThree MidtermsFinal Exam
“News Paper article responses+ 3 mid terms+ 1 Final”
POL1

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ as a teacher.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting , and exam risk. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

92/100

“Made the topic interesting and felt myself become passionate for the subject.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

92/100

“ as a teacher.”

🧪

66/100

“ so write down everything he says.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Lectures

  • His lectures are engaging and informative, without being biased.
  • He was such an amazing prof, and I'm so glad I chose his class.
  • Professor Druehl is the of my years of schooling.

Theme 2

📈 About Grades

  • He offers a TON of .
  • as long as you read the assigned chapters; he grades them on a .
  • Pretty easy to get an A as long as you attend lectures

Theme 3

📝 About Exams

  • Make sure to write down everything he says as .
  • 130+ questions in midterms... stay away
  • The , but because hes funny and passionate.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

274

Lifetime ratings

92/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 50 reviews cover many years and show a consistent pattern of strong teaching, , and .

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 5233
4 out of 526
3 out of 55
2 out of 56
1 out of 55

Course coverage

POL115 reviews
POLI00111 reviews
POLI19 reviews
POLI015 reviews
POL014 reviews
Show 4 more courses
POLISCI13 reviews
PLISCI1 review
POLI1 review
POLISCI1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

38 reported outcomes

A range

32

A+ 10 · A 19 · A- 3

B range

2

B 1 · B- 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

4

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 3