AI Rate Professor

English

Jasmina Topalovic

ESL173 · ESL5 · ESL262 · LING1 · ESL263 · ESL253 · ESL234 · ESL244 · ESL00561 · 33 lifetime ratings

AI rating
21/100
RMP rating
2.1/5
Take again
25%
Difficulty
4.1

The decision

Avoid unless you are comfortable with , and learning much of the material on your own.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerHarsh GraderHeavy HomeworkStrict AttendanceSelf-Study RequiredMixed Feedback
  • Most reviews describe very strict grading where effort does not reliably translate into high marks.
  • Online reviews are more mixed, with some recent students praising structure and feedback.
  • and repeatedly mention heavy work, poor support, and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

A is possible in some online sections, but many comments , and strong effort may still fall short.

Online evidence includes several A grades, while difficult.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

34/100

The , and self-study, with students calling the concepts harder than expected.

Online students mention hard concepts and self-learning, while .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

15/100

as mandatory, and one in-person review says students can be dropped after three skips.

Online attendance varies across reviews, but .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

26/100

Most students do not recommend her because , and a stressful class experience.

Online reviews are mixed with some praise, while .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

14/100

Students repeatedly and rarely gives full credit.

Format shift

Online reviews mention nitpicky discussion and , while in-person reviews describe failing or very low grades.

Workload

Heavy

22/100

Reviews frequently mention lots of , and research work.

Format shift

Online workload is weekly and structured, while as heavier and more stressful.

Teaching experience

Poor

32/100

A minority praise her care and feedback, but , and limited support.

Format shift

Online teaching feedback is split, while and often severe.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

Grades appear , and some quizzes or finals.

Format shift

Online reviews mention quizzes, discussions, midterm and , while , and quizzes.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

27 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews are strongly negative overall, centered on harsh , and weak teaching support.

Main concern

Many students describe low grades, stressful workload, and limited help even after strong effort.

What students said

No matter how much effort you put into an .
LING1
She will drop you after 3 skips.
ESL244
and you have to study everything at home yourself.
ESL253

Remote format

Online

7 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are mixed, with some students earning A grades but and .

Main concern

Students often need to teach themselves while , and projects.

What students said

She doesn't actually teach and and doesn't always have examples.
LING1
, but class was super hard learning wise.
LING1
, and she understands everyone's needs.
ESL244

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

, and AI-detection concerns, but they do not clearly prove open-book rules, proctoring, or webcam requirements.

QuizzesMidterm And Final EssaysFinal ProjectAI Detector ConcernExam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Varies

42/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and research papers, but do not clearly prove a consistent exam format or .

QuizzesEssaysResearch PaperTests Mentioned Without Clear Policy
, so I don't know where did I do wrong.
ESL244
Gave 0 in me 0, she accused me of Plagiarism.
ESL00561
She is lazy and we do it ourselves in class!
ESL244

Online

Online reviews mention quizzes, midterm and final essays, a , and one easy final, but .

QuizzesMidterm And Final EssaysFinal ProjectAI Detector Concern
Beware the midterm + final essays bc her ‘AI detector' will flag literally anything as AI assisted.
LING1
, but class was super hard learning wise.
LING1
Each week consists of reading/watching lectures, taking quizzes, responding to discussions, and .
LING1

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

No matter how much effort you put into an .

Voice snapshots generated from 34 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

32/100

She doesn't actually teach and and doesn't always have examples.

⚖️

14/100

No matter how good your assignment is there's always something wrong with it.

👍 Recommendation Level

26/100

...

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • , and she understands everyone's needs.
  • and you have to study everything at home yourself.
  • She is a good teacher, and she does everything she can to help.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty And Grades

  • The one class where I fell short of an A.
  • She is a so be ready to work hard.
  • Only class I couldn't get a A in because of the loss of points.

Theme 3

🧾 About Workload And Attendance

  • Each week consists of reading/watching lectures, taking quizzes, responding to discussions, and .
  • She will drop you after 3 skips.
  • Be prepared to do a lot of research and study on your own in this class.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

34

Recent reviews read by the AI

33

Lifetime ratings

78/100

Evidence confidence

The dataset has 34 reviews across many years with and workload, though some older reviews reduce current-course certainty.

Inside 34 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 56
4 out of 52
3 out of 50
2 out of 511
1 out of 515

Course coverage

ESL2447 reviews
LING17 reviews
ESL56 reviews
ESL2635 reviews
ESL2343 reviews
Show 4 more courses
ESL2533 reviews
ESL005611 review
ESL1731 review
ESL2621 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

11 reported outcomes

A range

7

A 5 · A- 2

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

2

C+ 1 · C- 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Incomplete 1