Is this an easy A?
HardWork
28/100A is possible in some online sections, but many comments , and strong effort may still fall short.
Online evidence includes several A grades, while difficult.
ESL173 · ESL5 · ESL262 · LING1 · ESL263 · ESL253 · ESL234 · ESL244 · ESL00561 · 33 lifetime ratings
The decision
Key questions
Is this an easy A?
A is possible in some online sections, but many comments say grading is strict, points are hard to keep, and strong effort may still fall short.
Online evidence includes several A grades, while in-person evidence repeatedly warns that high grades are difficult.
Is the course easy?
The material often requires heavy reading, essays, research, and self-study, with students calling the concepts harder than expected.
Online students mention hard concepts and self-learning, while in-person students describe stressful writing-heavy courses.
Is attendance flexible?
Attendance is repeatedly marked or described as mandatory, and one in-person review says students can be dropped after three skips.
Online attendance varies across reviews, but in-person evidence points to strict attendance rules.
Is this professor recommended?
Most students do not recommend her because they describe harsh grading, weak explanations, heavy work, and a stressful class experience.
Online reviews are mixed with some praise, while in-person reviews are mostly clear avoid warnings.
Course guide
Grading
Harsh
14/100
Students repeatedly say she takes off points even when assignments meet requirements and rarely gives full credit.
Format shift
Online reviews mention nitpicky discussion and essay grading, while in-person reviews describe failing or very low grades.
Workload
Heavy
22/100
Reviews frequently mention lots of homework, papers, readings, quizzes, discussions, and research work.
Format shift
Online workload is weekly and structured, while in-person workload is described as heavier and more stressful.
Teaching experience
Poor
32/100
A minority praise her care and feedback, but most comments describe unclear teaching, weak examples, and limited support.
Format shift
Online teaching feedback is split, while in-person feedback is mostly negative and often severe.
Assessment method
FocusOnAssignments
30/100
Grades appear driven mostly by essays, discussions, papers, homework, projects, and some quizzes or finals.
Format shift
Online reviews mention quizzes, discussions, midterm and final essays, while in-person reviews emphasize essays, papers, homework, and quizzes.
Luni fit check
Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.
Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.
Course format
Classroom format
High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner
In-person reviews are strongly negative overall, centered on harsh grading, heavy workload, strict attendance, and weak teaching support.
Main concern
Many students describe low grades, stressful workload, and limited help even after strong effort.
What students said
“No matter how much effort you put into an assignment you won't get full points on it.”
“She will drop you after 3 skips.”
“She doesn't explain anything and you have to study everything at home yourself.”
Remote format
Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro
Online reviews are mixed, with some students earning A grades but many warning about unclear teaching and nitpicky grading.
Main concern
Students often need to teach themselves while handling strict grading on discussions, essays, and projects.
What students said
“She doesn't actually teach and only uses slides that aren't specific and doesn't always have examples.”
“Final was easy, but class was super hard learning wise.”
“She explains very well, her classes are well structured, and she understands everyone's needs.”
Exam style
Reviews mention quizzes, essays, a final, and AI-detection concerns, but they do not clearly prove open-book rules, proctoring, or webcam requirements.
Assessment risk
Varies
42/100
Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.
In-person reviews mention quizzes, essays, tests, and research papers, but do not clearly prove a consistent exam format or exam policy.
“Every quizzes we did she doesn't review for us, so I don't know where did I do wrong.”
“Gave 0 in my research paper when I asked the reason for giving me 0, she accused me of Plagiarism.”
“She is lazy even to check our tests and we do it ourselves in class!”
Online reviews mention quizzes, midterm and final essays, a final project, and one easy final, but do not clearly prove proctoring or open-book policy.
“Beware the midterm + final essays bc her ‘AI detector' will flag literally anything as AI assisted.”
“Final was easy, but class was super hard learning wise.”
“Each week consists of reading/watching lectures, taking quizzes, responding to discussions, and recording final reflections.”
Student evidence
Top student voice
“No matter how much effort you put into an assignment you won't get full points on it.”
“She doesn't actually teach and only uses slides that aren't specific and doesn't always have examples.”
“No matter how good your assignment is there's always something wrong with it.”
“Absolutely do not take this class...”
Theme 1
Theme 2
Theme 3
Data context
Analysis sample
34
Recent reviews read by the AI
33
Lifetime ratings
78/100
Evidence confidence
The dataset has 34 reviews across many years with strong consistency on grading and workload, though some older reviews reduce current-course certainty.
Inside 34 stored ratings
Reported outcomes
11 reported outcomes
A 5 · A- 2
B+ 1
C+ 1 · C- 1
No reported values
No reported values
Incomplete 1