AI Rate Professor

De Anza College · Reading

Julie Wilson

LART211 · EWRT2 · READ200 · READD010 · READ10 · ERWT1A · EWRT211 · EWRT2A · EWRT1A · READING200 · READ211 · 55 lifetime ratings

AI rating
84/100
RMP rating
4.4/5
Take again
80%
Difficulty
2.9

The decision

Take Julie Wilson if you want a and are willing to keep up with , and participation.

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaring and supportiveLots of homeworkStrong feedbackParticipation mattersSometimes tough grader
  • Most , and engaging class environment.
  • The main tradeoff is a and writing workload, especially in EWRT courses.
  • Grades are achievable, but students , and revision work.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

68/100

Many students earn A grades, but comments repeatedly say the , and steady effort.

Online reviews lean more effort-heavy, while and easy grading when students participate.

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

The course content is not conceptually extreme, but , and essays make it feel demanding.

Online and in-person reviews both mention manageable content with meaningful workload, with online reviews sounding slightly more demanding.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

Attendance and participation are repeatedly marked mandatory or important, with cold-calling mentioned in several reviews.

, though a few in-person reviews say attendance was not mandatory.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

82/100

Most students recommend her because she is caring and helpful, but some warn against her workload and .

Both formats are mostly positive, but online reviews include sharper warnings about workload and toughness.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

Grading is mixed because students mention grace periods and revisions, but and .

Format shift

, while online reviews more often mention tough grading.

Workload

Heavy

35/100

Workload is heavy because many reviews mention lots of , and repeated assignments.

Format shift

Both formats report substantial workload, with online reviews especially direct about busy work and reading.

Teaching experience

Good

84/100

Most students find her caring, funny, engaging, and helpful, though a minority report harsh comments or .

Format shift

Both online and in-person reviews are mostly positive, but .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

22/100

Grades appear driven , and revisions rather than exams.

Format shift

Both formats emphasize assignments and writing over exams.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

39 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person reviews are , and writing improvement, with recurring workload concerns.

Main concern

Attendance and participation are often mandatory, and .

What students said

“ and will actively work to help you to pass.”
ERWT1A
“If you want an easy A DONT!”
EWRT2A
“Classroom engagement is a must!”
EWRT1A

Remote format

Online

11 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews are mostly positive but more clearly warn , and .

Main concern

Online students should expect lots of assignments and active participation.

What students said

“she does give a lot of busy work but everything is manageable.”
ERWT1A
“Not an easy A, but achievable if you do the work.”
EWRT2
“the workload is pretty bad and she cold-calls on people a lot so be ready for that.”
EWRT1A

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews focus more on essays, homework, quizzes, and , so exam strictness is not clearly proven.

EssaysQuizzesFinal ProjectRevision OpportunitiesExam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Varies

60/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews mention quizzes, essays, a final, and projects, but do not clearly prove a .

EssaysQuizzesFinalGroup Project
“hw every meeting, 2 book projects, 2 quizzes and a final.”
READ211
“I hated the group project as the final.”
READD010
“ , but she gives lots of homework and encourage us to read”
READ211

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, open-book, or .

Exam Policy Not Clearly ProvenHeavy AssignmentsReading And Writing
“Not an easy A, but achievable if you do the work.”
EWRT2
“Also be ready for a lot of reading and writing.”
EWRT1A

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Not an easy A, but achievable if you do the work.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

84/100

“ and is always willing to help even outside of regular class time.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

82/100

“ !”

⚖️ Workload Tradeoff

35/100

“There is A LOT of writing to do in this class, but she gives you all the materials and time necessary to get the work done.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Amazing teacher. .
  • and the work load is moderate.
  • She made me believe that I can do it!

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Not an easy A, but achievable if you do the work.
  • If you want an easy A DONT!
  • and she allows a revision on essays for up to 10% higher.

Theme 3

📝 About Workload

  • .
  • There are annoying, but grade is mostly focused on essays.
  • There is a lot of homework, but as long as you stay on top of it when she assigns it you should be fine.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

55

Lifetime ratings

91/100

Evidence confidence

The review set is large, spans many years, includes both formats, and shows consistent themes despite some mixed opinions.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 540
4 out of 55
3 out of 55
2 out of 50
1 out of 55

Course coverage

ERWT1A12 reviews
EWRT1A10 reviews
EWRT29 reviews
READ2119 reviews
EWRT2A2 reviews
Show 6 more courses
READ102 reviews
READD0102 reviews
EWRT2111 review
LART2111 review
READ2001 review
READING2001 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

44 reported outcomes

A range

29

A+ 6 · A 19 · A- 4

B range

10

B+ 4 · B 5 · B- 1

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

4

Audit/No Grade 1 · Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 1 · Rather not say 1