AI Rate Professor

Political Science

Alysa Cisneros

POLID001 · POLI16 · POLI001 · 9 lifetime ratings

AI rating
91/100
RMP rating
4.7/5
Take again
77.78%
Difficulty
2.8

The decision

Take Alysa Cisneros if you want a path but real weekly participation work.

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaring ProfessorExtra CreditParticipation MattersReading HeavyMultiple Attempts
  • Students praise her care, support, and relevant political science material.
  • Grades are very reachable because of and multiple quiz attempts.
  • The main , and civic engagement hours.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

83/100

An A and , but students still need to keep up with readings and civic engagement.

Online evidence strongly supports an easy grade path with workload, while the and .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

The and relevant, but , and civic engagement make it more than effortless.

Online reviews give most of the difficulty evidence; the one in-person review also says the class is easy but .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

52/100

Attendance and participation expectations vary across reviews, with and others not mandatory.

Online reviews are mixed, while the .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

84/100

Most students recommend her because she is caring and fair, though workload and .

Online reviews are mostly positive with some concerns, and the .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

84/100

Multiple quiz attempts and frequent make grading forgiving despite the amount of work.

Format shift

Online reviews provide most lenient-grading evidence, and the and easy passing.

Workload

Moderate

46/100

The workload includes readings, weekly quizzes, discussion posts, civic engagement hours, and a .

Format shift

Online reviews show the clearest workload burden, while the .

Teaching experience

Excellent

88/100

Students describe her as caring, supportive, inspirational, and good at connecting politics to real life.

Format shift

Online reviews strongly support this, and the .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

35/100

Grades appear driven mainly by quizzes, readings, discussion posts, civic engagement, , and papers rather than major exams.

Format shift

Online evidence is detailed; and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

The single in-person review says the class is easy to pass, useful, and supported by .

Main concern

The evidence .

What students said

“Quiz heavy, but they have lots of attempts and arent hard.”
POLID001
“Lots of opportunities, very easy class to pass and learn a lot from.”
POLID001

Remote format

Online

8 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews are mostly very positive, with strong , and some workload concerns.

Main concern

Online students mention , and slow grading.

What students said

“12 hours needed for civic engagement.”
POLI001
“ an A.”
POLID001
“She so I didn't even know what my grade was until the last week.”
POLI001

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mainly describe weekly quizzes with multiple attempts and , but they .

Weekly QuizzesMultiple AttemptsExtra CreditFinal Paper

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

76/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The and are not hard, but it does not clearly prove proctoring or .

Quiz HeavyMultiple AttemptsExtra Credit
“Quiz heavy, but they have lots of attempts and arent hard.”
POLID001

Online

, but do not clearly prove proctoring, webcam, Lockdown Browser, or open-book policy.

Weekly QuizzesMultiple AttemptsExtra CreditFinal Paper
“ an A.”
POLID001
“There is a 4-6 .”
POLID001

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Professor Cisneros is great and caring!”

Voice snapshots generated from 9 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

88/100

“Alysa is awesome.”

📈 Grade Path

83/100

“ an A.”

🧭 Workload Reality

46/100

“12 hours needed for civic engagement.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Professor Cisneros is great and caring!
  • Alysa is awesome.
  • Very caring and personable teacher.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • It was rigorous and required participation, but it was a relatively easy A.
  • an A.
  • Lots of opportunities, very easy class to pass and learn a lot from.

Theme 3

🧰 About Workload

  • 12 hours needed for civic engagement.
  • There is a fair bit of reading but it is all current and relevant so it was very enjoyable!
  • There is a 4-6 .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

9

Recent reviews read by the AI

9

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Nine reviews across several years are mostly consistent and include detailed , and course tasks.

Inside 9 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 57
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

POLID0014 reviews
POLI0013 reviews
POLI162 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

8 reported outcomes

A range

7

A+ 2 · A 5

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values