AI Rate Professor

De Anza College · Computer Information Systems

Ursel Nguyen

CIS27 · ACCT202 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
2.8/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
2.0

The decision

, because the recent grading complaint conflicts with old easy-A comments.

Best fit · Self Taught ProMixed Teaching QualityTough Grading ConcernEasy A ClaimsOld Sparse Evidence
  • The evidence is highly inconsistent, with both very low and very high ratings.
  • Recent feedback raises a strict grading concern in CIS27.
  • Several older reviews suggest the course may be easy to pass, but they are vague and dated.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

Old reviews suggest easy A outcomes, but the recent CIS27 review reports point deductions and .

Only in-person evidence exists, and it is inconsistent across years.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

66/100

Most difficulty ratings are low, but the recent CIS27 review rates the course very difficult.

course look easier than the recent one.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

20/100

The .

, and there is no online evidence.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

25/100

The latest detailed review is negative, and the overall recommendation .

Only in-person evidence exists, and most recommendation fields are missing.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

30/100

The most recent detailed though older comments imply easy A outcomes.

Format shift

Only in-person evidence exists, and .

Workload

Light

68/100

There is little workload detail, and older low difficulty ratings suggest the workload may be light.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews exist, and workload evidence is weak.

Teaching experience

Poor

35/100

Teaching quality is too inconsistent to trust, with two 1-star reviews and only vague positive comments.

Format shift

review being negative.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

The only specific , and exercises rather than exams.

Format shift

Only in-person evidence exists, and assessment evidence is limited.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

All reviews are in person, and they are sparse, old, and sharply inconsistent.

Main concern

The clearest .

What students said

“He just doesn't give the grade as needed”
CIS27
“A for learning nothing.”
CIS27
“ ”
ACCT202

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove a formal exam policy, proctoring, open-book status, midterm format, or .

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

exam policy, proctoring, open-book status, midterm format, or .

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“He just doesn't give the grade as needed”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews, highlighting inconsistent grading, ease, and teaching signals. Credibility rating: Low.

⚖️

30/100

“He just doesn't give the grade as needed”

🎯 Teaching Quality

35/100

“A for learning nothing.”

📉 Credibility Limit

30/100

“good!!!!!!!!!”

Theme 1

⚖️

  • He just doesn't give the grade as needed
  • A for learning nothing.

Theme 2

📈 About Ease

  • good!!!!!!!!!
  • Course DIFFICULTY rating: 1

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

30/100

Evidence confidence

Only 4 in-person reviews are available, most are old or vague, and the comments conflict heavily.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

CIS273 reviews
ACCT2021 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A+ 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values