AI Rate Professor

English

Jennifer Penkethman

D001A · EWRT1B · ENG1B · EWRT2 · EWRIT1A · EWRT1A · 35 lifetime ratings

AI rating
95/100
RMP rating
4.3/5
Take again
77.78%
Difficulty
2.0

The decision

Take her if you want a and .

Best fit · Effort For RewardClear feedbackEasy graderCaring teacherReading and essaysParticipation matters
  • Students repeatedly describe her as , and .
  • Getting an A is very realistic if students attend, read, and .
  • The , and participation rather than hard exams.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

86/100

An A is very reachable because , but students , and on-time submissions.

Online evidence points to easy work and , while and late-work expectations.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

74/100

The course content is mostly readable and essay-based, but , and steady participation.

Online reviews call the structure straightforward, while and reading pressure.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

35/100

participation points, though a few sections are more flexible.

Online reviews are mostly non-mandatory except one review, while .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

88/100

Most students recommend her because , and makes English manageable.

Both formats are positive, with online reviews slightly more focused on convenience and and class experience.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

83/100

Students often call her an easy or and assignments are completed.

Format shift

Online reviews mention clear grading and not being a , while but stricter late policies.

Workload

Moderate

68/100

Workload is manageable but , and several essays.

Format shift

Online work is described as weekly discussions and four essays, while , and participation.

Teaching experience

Excellent

90/100

Students , and ability to make English more engaging.

Format shift

Both formats support strong teaching, though and boring class time.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Grades appear driven mostly by essays, drafts, reading work, journals, and participation, with .

Format shift

Online reviews mainly mention discussions and essays, while , finals, and quizzes.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

31 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews praise her feedback and teaching, while , and participation.

Main concern

Late work and grade.

What students said

“Show up to class and put in the work and its an easy A.”
ENG1B
“Harsh late policy (basically no late work) and grades quite slowly.”
EWRIT1A

Remote format

Online

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews are strongly positive, with , and .

Main concern

Summer or if time management is weak.

What students said

“Everything was fairly easy and not really time consuming.”
EWRT1A
“Took this class over the summer, pretty difficult but the course is straightforward and doable as long as you manage your time.”
EWRT1A

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam evidence points to writing-based midterms and finals with some student-friendly preparation, but policies.

In-Class EssayPrepared ArticleOpen Book QuizDictionary AllowedMidterm And Final Writing

Assessment risk

Standard

76/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

final essay, an open-book quiz, and some allowed preparation tools.

In-Class EssayPrepared ArticleOpen Book QuizDictionary Allowed
“ and final. She gave you the article beforehand so that you can prepare!”
EWRIT1A
“For non-native speakers, you are allowed to use e-dictionary during the test.”
EWRT1A
“ and group discussion written to be turned in.”
EWRT1A

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Show up to class and put in the work and its an easy A.”

Voice snapshots generated from 35 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

Teaching Quality

90/100

“ and will improve your writing greatly.”

83/100

“She's easy going and essays.”

Effort For Grade

86/100

“If you attend class regularly and put some efforts on essays, there is no way not to get an A.”

Theme 1

Teaching Style

  • She makes boring literature interesting.
  • Her lectures are informative and easy to follow.
  • and caring.

Theme 2

Difficulty And Grades

  • Show up to class and put in the work and its an easy A.
  • Extremely easy A if you're a native English speaker.
  • Need 93+ to get an A.

Theme 3

Workload And Attendance

  • and 4 main essays to do.
  • but she helps you write them so it's not that hard.
  • Harsh late policy (basically no late work) and grades quite slowly.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

35

Recent reviews read by the AI

35

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

The sample has 35 reviews across many years, mostly consistent praise, and enough recent comments to support the judgment.

Inside 35 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 521
4 out of 58
3 out of 55
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

EWRT1A21 reviews
EWRT1B5 reviews
EWRIT1A3 reviews
EWRT23 reviews
ENG1B2 reviews
Show 1 more courses
D001A1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

24 reported outcomes

A range

19

A+ 5 · A 12 · A- 2

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

4

Incomplete 1 · Not sure yet 2 · Not_Sure_Yet 1