AI Rate Professor

Computer Information Systems

Seema Gupta

CIS40 · CISD022A · CIS22A · 10 lifetime ratings

AI rating
65/100
RMP rating
3.5/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
2.9

The decision

if you want a caring professor, but check the course format and be ready for tests if taking it in person.

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaringHelpfulFlexible RevisionsMixed Teaching QualityTest Heavy Risk
  • Recent reviews are much stronger than older reviews.
  • , and easier pacing.
  • and weak test preparation.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

An A is realistic, especially online, but and grading rules can make it costly.

Online evidence points to revisions and easy pacing, while .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

66/100

The content is usually described as manageable, but beginners may not get enough depth or .

Online reviews call the class easy or slow, while .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

and optional reports.

Both online and in-person reviews include mandatory and .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

58/100

Students like her care and support, but recommendations are sharply split because of tests and course depth.

Online reviews are more favorable overall, while .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

56/100

Online grading looks flexible through revisions, but and .

Format shift

Online reviews mention resubmissions, while and .

Workload

Moderate

64/100

Workload is steady with labs, readings, and assessments, but not usually described as overwhelming.

Format shift

Online workload is weekly and structured, while assignments.

Teaching experience

Average

65/100

Students consistently call her caring, but some criticize pacing, clarity, and .

Format shift

Online teaching feedback is mostly supportive, while .

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

Reviews mention labs, homework, assessments, midterms, and .

Format shift

Online reviews mention weekly labs and midterms, while .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are split, with recent praise for kindness but older , and weak preparation.

Main concern

as hard and grading as unforgiving.

What students said

“1000% recommended. Thank me later. She is the most amazing teacher.”
CIS22A
“I got an A by trying very very hard.”
CIS22A

Remote format

Online

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

Online reviews are mostly positive, with , and flexible resubmissions, but one student says it is too slow for beginners who need stronger programming depth.

Main concern

The online course may feel too slow or shallow for students who want deeper programming preparation.

What students said

“She's flexible in grading and allows students to correct mistakes and resubmit their work for a higher score.”
CISD022A
“I felt like the class is way too slow and that more time could have been spent learning as many concepts as possible.”
CISD022A

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews prove midterms and finals exist, but and .

MidtermsFinalHard TestsFew Points Available

Assessment risk

Varies

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and finals, but they do not clearly prove closed-book or .

Hard TestsMidtermsFinal
“Only 3 tests, 2 mids, 1 final.”
CIS22A
“the questions in the .”
CIS40

Online

Online reviews mention midterms and , but they do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, open-book, or Lockdown Browser policy.

MidtermsFew Points Available
“There are few points available (100), but you can revise your work.”
CIS22A
“1 lab due per week, 1 participation lab from Lab Manuals given to you each week, and 2 midterms.”
CIS22A

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ participate in her lectures.”

Voice snapshots generated from 10 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and exams; credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

65/100

“she likes to help you until you understand the whole things.”

⚖️

56/100

“She's flexible in grading and allows students to correct mistakes and resubmit their work for a higher score.”

🧪

45/100

“The us a chance to practice or know what the ”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • 1000% recommended. Thank me later. She is the most amazing teacher.
  • Kind teacher, she and class time is used to introduce the new chapter, answer questions, review assignments, and general updates.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • Professor Gupta's class is quite easy.
  • I got an A by trying very very hard.

Theme 3

🧪 About Tests

  • Only 3 tests, 2 mids, 1 final.
  • The and it has too few questions.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

10

Recent reviews read by the AI

10

Lifetime ratings

70/100

Evidence confidence

Ten reviews across several years give useful evidence, but opinions changed over time and differ by format.

Inside 10 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 54
1 out of 50

Course coverage

CIS22A5 reviews
CIS403 reviews
CISD022A2 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

8 reported outcomes

A range

6

A+ 2 · A 2 · A- 2

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Not sure yet 2