AI Rate Professor

Accounting

Mary Breen

ACCT1B · ACCT1 · ACCT1A · 12 lifetime ratings

AI rating
43/100
RMP rating
3.2/5
Take again
75%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

Choose Breen only if and a strict classroom tone in exchange for and effort-based grading.

Best fit · Effort For RewardLots of HomeworkExtra CreditEasy GradingRude Tone ConcernsAccounting Practice Heavy
  • Reviews and serious complaints about attitude.
  • and help students pass.
  • The only online review is recent and strongly negative about teaching style and workload.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

64/100

and effort-based grading can make passing easier, but the homework load and .

Online evidence suggests easy grading with heavy homework, while and cheat sheets but .

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

Accounting work is made passable through practice and cheat sheets, but and .

The single online review calls the class easy but poorly taught, while .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

Recent and positive as mandatory, and participation matters appears in the online review.

Online attendance is mandatory, and several in-person ACCT1A .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

50/100

and , while others strongly warn against her attitude and teaching style.

Online evidence is negative, while and strong avoidance.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

72/100

Many reviews mention , dropped work, cheat sheets, and .

Format shift

Online evidence says she grades on effort and completion, while and dropped assignments.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

as heavy, including online, written, and accounting practice work.

Format shift

Online evidence says a ton of homework, while .

Teaching experience

Poor

48/100

and pass-friendly structure are offset by repeated , and little teaching.

Format shift

Online teaching evidence is strongly negative, while and mostly older.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

, and a final rather than a purely exam-only structure.

Format shift

In-person reviews provide most assessment details, while and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

11 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are mixed, with some calling her helpful and easy to pass, while , and .

Main concern

and a harsh communication style.

What students said

“VERY EASY TO PASS CLASS. You get so much .”
ACCT1A
“Extremely rude and nearly made an ESL student cry on the second day of class.”
ACCT1

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The only online review is highly negative, describing rude interactions, device issues, little teaching, and .

Main concern

Online evidence warns about poor teaching support and a .

What students said

“little to no actual teaching, and a ton of homework”
ACCT1A
“She normally grades on effort and completion rather than correctness.”
ACCT1A

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam evidence is more student-friendly than strict because several reviews mention cheat sheets, , and dropped work, though long or .

Cheat Sheet AllowedExtra CreditDrops Lowest TestTestsFinal

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

72/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews explicitly mention tests and , and dropped low scores, but also some long or .

Cheat Sheet AllowedExtra CreditDrops Lowest TestTestsFinal
“Every test and .”
ACCT1A
“Four tests, each 100 points ,drops lowest.”
ACCT1A

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, open-book, take-home, quiz format, midterm format, or .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you're willing to put up with device problems, mood swings, little to no actual teaching, and a ton of .”

Voice snapshots generated from 12 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and exams; credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

48/100

“Rude when asked questions, condescending, and overall a BAD teacher.”

⚖️

72/100

“She normally grades on effort and completion rather than correctness.”

📚 Workload

28/100

“She Give you A lot of Homework and you have to work for your grade but I loved Her and ”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Shes a great teacher and grades easy.
  • Not good at explaining things clearly, doesn't like to repeat herself.
  • She explained well. If you have any question, just ASK.

Theme 2

📈 About Grades and

  • VERY EASY TO PASS CLASS. You get so much .
  • EASY class. She gives a lot of homework and EXTRA CREDITS.
  • She normally grades on effort and completion rather than correctness.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Conduct and Workload

  • Rude when asked questions, condescending, and overall a BAD teacher.
  • She gives alot of EC but als alot of HW.
  • Be prepared to be put on spot to answer question. avoid.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

12

Recent reviews read by the AI

12

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Twelve reviews provide useful evidence, but most are old and the only online review is a .

Inside 12 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 56
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 52
1 out of 53

Course coverage

ACCT1A8 reviews
ACCT12 reviews
0004521 review
ACCT1B1 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

2

B 1 · B- 1

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1