AI Rate Professor

De Anza College · Administration Of Justice

Kevin Rudich

ADMJ6 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
57/100
RMP rating
3.3/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
2.5

The decision

He may work for independent online students, but the limited data shows real teaching-quality risk.

Best fit · Self Taught ProHelpful OnlineAccessibleTextbook BasedFew GradesWeak In-Person Teaching
  • Online reviews are mostly positive about his helpfulness and accessibility.
  • The but not a trained instructor.
  • Evidence is limited, so the rating should be treated cautiously.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

68/100

Grades reported are decent, but comments do not show a free A and one review warns that there are only three graded items.

Online evidence shows A-range grades with few graded items, while the .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

66/100

Difficulty ratings are moderate to low, but students still need to read and handle textbook-based lectures.

Online reviews suggest manageable work, while the .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

70/100

, while one online review says it was mandatory.

Online attendance evidence conflicts, and the .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

55/100

Students praise his helpfulness online, but the as an elective.

Online reviews lean positive, while the .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

62/100

Reported grades are decent, but few graded items can make the .

Format shift

Online reviews provide the ; the .

Workload

Moderate

60/100

The workload seems manageable but .

Format shift

Online reviews mention textbook summaries and few gradebook items, while .

Teaching experience

Average

58/100

Online students call him helpful, but course.

Format shift

Teaching evidence is positive online and negative in person.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Reviews mention textbook-based lectures and very few graded items, but do not clearly prove an .

Format shift

Only online reviews give assessment details; in-person evidence is too limited.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The and says he is not a trained instructor.

Main concern

Instruction quality may be weak in person.

What students said

“Great guy, just not a trained instructor.”
ADMJ6

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are mostly positive, but one says lectures are only mid and the .

Main concern

The course and a small number of graded items.

What students said

“A helpful professor”
ADMJ6
“There were only 3 things in the grade book.”
ADMJ6

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the use, or final format.

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The , Lockdown Browser, open-book rules, quiz format, midterm format, or final format.

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Very compassionate and helpful professor!”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, support, and . Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

58/100

“Great guy, just not a trained instructor.”

👍 Online Support

70/100

“Very compassionate and helpful professor!”

⚖️

62/100

“There were only 3 things in the grade book.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • A helpful professor
  • Very compassionate and helpful professor!
  • Great guy, just not a trained instructor.

Theme 2

📚 About Course Structure

  • There were only 3 things in the grade book.
  • Lectures are mid and just summaries of the textbook with some of his input about the California/Santa Clara system.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

38/100

Evidence confidence

Only 4 reviews are available, and the split between online and .

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ADMJ64 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

2

A- 2

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1