AI Rate Professor

Counseling

Robert Alexander

HUMAN20 · COUN101 · CLP07CRN25226 · CLPD007 · CLP007 · HUMA20 · CLP7 · HUMA10 · CPL7 · 100 lifetime ratings

AI rating
94/100
RMP rating
4.7/5
Take again
92.47%
Difficulty
2.0

The decision

if you want a , but be more cautious with online sections if organization matters to you.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyCaring and respectedEasy A with participationEngaging lecturesExtra creditOnline organization issues
  • Most students describe him as caring, funny, and highly engaging, especially in person.
  • Grades are usually easy if students show up, participate, and complete the work.
  • Online sections are easy but and slow communication.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

88/100

Getting an A is usually easy if , and keep up with basic reading.

Online evidence shows a very easy grade but more self-teaching, while and participation.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

78/100

The content is approachable and often opinion-based, though , and discussion.

Online sections are described as easier but less guided, while because lectures and guest speakers make the material engaging.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

35/100

participation, even though some reviews say it was not required.

Online attendance varies, while and participating.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

92/100

Students recommend him because , and makes the class feel useful and low stress.

In-person reviews are more consistently enthusiastic, while online reviews include both strong praise and .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

87/100

Grades are usually generous, with , and many reported A grades.

Format shift

Both formats look grade-friendly, but .

Workload

Light

74/100

Most students describe the work as manageable, though a few mention lots of .

Format shift

Online workload is easy but sometimes uneven, while and participation-based.

Teaching experience

Excellent

88/100

as caring and engaging, but online sections reduce the score because of organization and communication issues.

Format shift

In-person teaching is consistently excellent, while online teaching has mixed evidence because several students felt unsupported or .

Assessment method

Balanced

46/100

Assessment , and participation rather than relying only on exams.

Format shift

Online reviews mention assignments, discussions, and online tests, while in-person , and group tests.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

33 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person reviews are strongly positive, with students praising his , and .

Main concern

Attendance and participation are often expected.

What students said

“Easy A if you do all your work and participate !”
HUMA10
“His lectures were interesting and funny.”
HUMA20
“ if you want to pass.”
HUMA20

Remote format

Online

17 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

and caring tone, but several students report poor Canvas organization and .

Main concern

and limited instructor presence.

What students said

“Very easy class. and approachable.”
HUMA10
“ . .”
HUMA20
“I 100% recommend this class to anyone and everyone!!!”
CLP007

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam evidence points to student-friendly tests, including take-home formats, group tests, study guides, , and easy online tests.

Take-Home TestsGroup TestsTwo Final AttemptsEasy TestsStudy GuidesQuiz Retakes

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

88/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews explicitly , and , making the exam setup very student-friendly.

Take-Home TestsGroup TestsStudy GuidesQuiz Retakes
“ :)”
HUMA10
“ ”
HUMA20
“ and gives you study guides!”
HUMA20

Online

, and two attempts on an online final, but they do not clearly prove webcam rules, proctoring, or open-book policy.

No Midterm MentionedTwo Online Final AttemptsEasy Tests
“ and you get 2 attempts at the ”
HUMA10
“Easy tests.”
HUMA10

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Robert Alexander is the apply for my degrees from DeAnza and gave me reassurance that I was on track to transfer.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences; credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

88/100

“He's honestly the because of how enjoyable and engaging he makes it to be.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

92/100

“I 100% recommend this class to anyone and everyone!!!”

📈 Easy A Signal

88/100

“Easy A if you do all your work and participate !”

⚠️ Online Organization

55/100

“The class was easy, but .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • His lectures were interesting and funny.
  • He truly does care for every single one of his students and !
  • He's a really fun and engaging teacher, he makes the whole class extremely interesting even through lectures.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Easy A if you do all your work and participate !
  • But, just turn in all the and the class will be an easy A.
  • If you show up and put in the bare minimum, you'll pass his class.

Theme 3

💻 About Online Sections

  • The canvas shell is completely disorganized and 2020.
  • You have to basically teach yourself sex ed based on the reading.
  • He had personal problems this quarter so he wasnt as active.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

100

Lifetime ratings

91/100

Evidence confidence

The analysis is based on 50 reviews across online and and mostly consistent comments over several years.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 585
4 out of 58
3 out of 52
2 out of 52
1 out of 53

Course coverage

HUMA1021 reviews
HUMA2015 reviews
CLP73 reviews
COUN1013 reviews
CLP0072 reviews
Show 4 more courses
CPL72 reviews
HUMAN202 reviews
CLP07CRN252261 review
CLPD0071 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

35 reported outcomes

A range

28

A+ 10 · A 15 · A- 3

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

7

Not sure yet 7