AI Rate Professor

International Studies

Anu Khanna

ICS7 · SPCH16 · COMM16 · ICS10 · ICS7H · INTER7 · SPCH10 · COMMD010 · ICSSPCH · ICS007 · 40 lifetime ratings

AI rating
80/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
70.83%
Difficulty
2.3

The decision

if you want an and can keep up with regular reading, writing, and participation.

Best fit · Effort For RewardEngaging but PolarizingCaring FeedbackReading and ParticipationManageable Easy AWorkload Can Pile Up
  • Most students describe Khanna as engaging, caring, and clear, but a smaller group reports political friction and harsh interactions.
  • Grades are usually reachable with , and reading, but they are not always effortless.
  • Online reviews are and workload, while in-person reviews more often praise class energy and discussion.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

An A is very reachable if students keep up with , and participation, but it is not a free A for students who coast.

Online evidence includes explicit easy-A comments, while but more frequent attendance and participation expectations.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

74/100

The content is usually described as easy or common-sense, with the main , and discussion work.

Online reviews call the class easy and mellow, while but class participation matters more.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

35/100

, though a few reviews say it was not required.

Both formats include mandatory-attendance reports, but online .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

72/100

, but repeated complaints about tone, politics, and grading prevent a must-take rating.

, while online reviews are more split between strong praise and sharp complaints.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

62/100

Grades are generally attainable and , but several students still call her a tough or careful grader.

Format shift

Online reviews mention resubmissions and easy grades, while in-person reviews mix lenient-grader praise with .

Workload

Moderate

52/100

The course usually has , but most students describe the work as manageable if done on time.

Format shift

Online reviews describe weekly assignments and delayed grading, while , and participation.

Teaching experience

Good

78/100

Her strongest reviews praise her as , and inspiring, but negative reviews describe rude behavior and political friction.

Format shift

Online teaching is praised for feedback and structure but , while in-person teaching is praised for energy and class engagement.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

Reviews , and participation rather than exam-heavy grading.

Format shift

Online evidence centers on weekly assignments and projects, while , and participation.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

29 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are mostly positive about her energy and clarity, but some students report , and political tension.

Main concern

Students who dislike discussion-heavy or opinion-sensitive classes may struggle with the classroom tone.

What students said

“Professor Khanna is brilliant and engaging.”
ICS007
“There was a lot of to manage at times.”
ICS10
“She is way too political and pushes it upon students to come correct.”
COMMD010

Remote format

Online

11 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews show a manageable class with , but some students complain about delayed grading, workload, and strict tone.

Main concern

Online students may .

What students said

“The only problem I had was that she didn't grade any of the ”
ICS007
“This professor and class is pretty easy and mellow.”
COMM16
“Do the work and get an A.”
SPCH16

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

, but the clearest comments describe quizzes or tests as manageable rather than strictly proctored.

Open Book QuizQuizlet-Based TestsSimple TestsReading-Based Midterm and Final

Assessment risk

Standard

66/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and reading-based midterm and final, but do not clearly prove strict proctoring or closed-book rules.

Open Book QuizSimple TestsReading-Based Midterm and Final
“There is assignment and book quiz.”
ICS7
“The tests are simple, just study your notes and the book if .”
SPCH16
“The ”
ICS7

Online

but do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, open-book, or take-home rules.

Quizlet-Based Tests
“ ”
COMM16

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Absolutely love Professor Khanna. This online class is a MUST for Comms majors & Anu is so wonderful. Do the work and get an A.”

Voice snapshots generated from 40 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and classroom tone; credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

78/100

“Professor Khanna is brilliant and engaging.”

👍 Recommendation Level

72/100

“ !”

📈 Grade Effort

78/100

“Just do the homework and an A won't be so hard to reach.”

⚖️ Workload Balance

52/100

“There was a lot of to manage at times.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Professor Khanna is brilliant and engaging.
  • She teaches the material clearly and is very knowledgable.
  • She is wonderful to listen to because she is so passionate about what she teaches.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • Do the work and get an A.
  • Easy A as long as you keep up with the easy workload.
  • If you do your part, it's an easy A :)

Theme 3

📝 About Workload

  • , but the assignments/projects are not difficult.
  • Typically 2 assign. a week, 3 projects total.
  • There is a decent amount of so you do have to earn your grade

Theme 4

⚠️ About Concerns

  • She is way too political and pushes it upon students to come correct.
  • She only gives high marks to the people she likes .
  • You will learn nothing of value in this course but at least the class is easy.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

40

Recent reviews read by the AI

40

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

The analysis uses 40 reviews across many years and both formats, with consistent themes around engagement, workload, participation, and grading.

Inside 40 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 523
4 out of 55
3 out of 57
2 out of 51
1 out of 54

Course coverage

ICS712 reviews
ICS00711 reviews
SPCH165 reviews
COMM163 reviews
COMMD0102 reviews
Show 5 more courses
ICS102 reviews
SPCH102 reviews
ICS7H1 review
ICSSPCH1 review
INTER71 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

22 reported outcomes

A range

14

A+ 8 · A 5 · A- 1

B range

4

B+ 2 · B 1 · B- 1

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Not sure yet 3