AI Rate Professor

English

Laura Orella

ENG1A · EWRT1BZ · EWRT1BONLINE · EWRT1B · EWIRT002 · ENG1B · EWRT2 · ENGLISH1B · EWRT2A · ERWT2 · ENGLISH2 · 39 lifetime ratings

AI rating
35/100
RMP rating
2.3/5
Take again
43.75%
Difficulty
2.9

The decision

Take this professor only if , and tolerate unclear guidance.

Best fit · Self Taught ProDisorganized CanvasVague FeedbackHeavy EssaysMixed GradingPolarizing Helpfulness
  • Students repeatedly , and vague feedback.
  • The course content is often not intellectually hard, but the workload can feel frustrating because of essays, readings, and .
  • Some students report easy grades and helpful support, but the dominant advice is caution or avoidance.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

An A is possible for decent writers who keep up, but , and mixed grading make it more work than a true easy A.

Online reviews more often mention easy passing, while in person reviews include stronger complaints about workload and harsh or .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

64/100

The writing content is often described as not hard, but the course structure .

Both formats describe manageable content, but online students complain more about Canvas navigation while in .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

as optional in some sections and mandatory in others, so flexibility depends on the course setup.

Online , while in person reviews include several mandatory-attendance reports.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

38/100

Many students warn against taking her because , and disorganization outweigh the easier grading reports.

Online reviews are mixed, but in person reviews contain more repeated and .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

51/100

strict and others saying good grades are easy if work is submitted.

Format shift

Online and easy-A claims, while in person reviews show the same split with more harsh-grading complaints.

Workload

Heavy

35/100

Students , and forum tasks even when the material is not hard.

Format shift

Online workload is sometimes called bearable, but and assignment volume.

Teaching experience

Poor

36/100

The main pattern is unclear , and weak responsiveness, despite a minority of caring or .

Format shift

Online reviews focus on messy Canvas and , while in person reviews add more complaints about attitude and .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

15/100

The class is driven , and online posts rather than exams.

Format shift

and projects as the main assessment path.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

30 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In person reviews are mostly negative, with repeated complaints , and uneven grading.

Main concern

Students often feel they must teach themselves while and many writing tasks.

What students said

“Genuinely one of the .”
ENG1A
“She mostly showers you in homework and essays, including reading the material the essay is about, rather than teaching anything or .”
ERWT2
“She didn't have a set calendar and and she was very rude if you asked for clarity.”
EWRT2A

Remote format

Online

9 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are split, with some students finding the class easy and others calling the and stressful.

Main concern

Messy Canvas organization and .

What students said

“ , you start the class missing 18 assignments from as far back as 2019.”
EWRT1B
“Extremely vague directions for assignments.”
ERWT2
“Her online class is SO disorganized.”
EWRT2

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

exam evidence, so strict proctoring risk is not proven.

Essay-Based AssessmentNo Exams ReportedExam Policy Unclear

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

82/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In person reviews include clear evidence of no traditional exams in at least some sections and an .

No Exams ReportedEssay-Based FinalDraft Submitted By Email
“Only 3 essays total, and no exams.”
EWRT1B
“The by email.”
EWRT2

Online

Online reviews describe essays and group work, but do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, open-book, midterm, or .

Essay-Based WorkGroup ProjectExam Policy Unclear
“3 essays + 1 research essay.”
EWIRT002
“She gives out three essays during the entirety of the quarter.”
EWRT1BONLINE

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Getting an A is doable, but .”

Voice snapshots generated from 39 reviews, highlighting repeated themes in , and organization. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

36/100

“Genuinely one of the .”

⚖️

51/100

“She grades harshly, and .”

🧾 Workload Reality

35/100

“Just ready to do essay every week except that it was a great class”

👍 Recommendation Risk

38/100

“ ”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She really care about her students she really helps you to understand and .
  • She , and her comments on papers are vague and unhelpful.
  • .
  • She is totally unhelpful and snaps at you when you ask for help, instead of answering your questions.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty And Grades

  • Getting an A is doable, but .
  • You can pass pretty easily by just writing some gibberish and she will eat it up.
  • Super easy class, didn't learn much.
  • You have to be an accomplished writer to get an A.

Theme 3

🗂️ About Organization

  • , you start the class missing 18 assignments from as far back as 2019.
  • The and difficult to manage.
  • The , if you don't look all over the place for clues on deadlines, instructions, etc. you're gonna have problems.
  • Her class is completely unorganized, and .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

39

Recent reviews read by the AI

39

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

The dataset has 39 reviews across many years with repeated, detailed themes, though older reviews reduce current certainty.

Inside 39 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 54
3 out of 59
2 out of 55
1 out of 516

Course coverage

EWRT1B11 reviews
EWRT210 reviews
ERWT24 reviews
EWRT1BONLINE3 reviews
ENG1A2 reviews
Show 6 more courses
ENG1B2 reviews
EWIRT0022 reviews
EWRT2A2 reviews
ENGLISH1B1 review
ENGLISH21 review
EWRT1BZ1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

13 reported outcomes

A range

8

A 8

B range

2

B+ 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Not sure yet 3