AI Rate Professor

De Anza College · Education

Li Wei Sun

G10 · CD122 · CC02 · CD50 · CD10H · CD12 · CD10G · CDCD50 · CD55 · CD51 · CD10 · 54 lifetime ratings

AI rating
43/100
RMP rating
2.5/5
Take again
45%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

Take Li Wei Sun only if you can keep up with , and strict deadlines while tolerating mixed teaching quality.

Best fit · Effort For RewardLecture heavyStrict late workHeavy readingUnclear assignmentsCaring but polarizing
  • Recent reviews are more positive, but older reviews repeatedly report rude communication and .
  • Students often say the subject is manageable, but the instructor can make the course harder through strict rules and vague expectations.
  • Grades can be decent when students attend, read, and submit everything on time, but the path to an A is not low effort.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

45/100

An A is possible, but students , and grading issues that make it costly.

Online evidence points to effort-based passing with strict deadlines, while hard grading.

Is the course easy?

Standard

47/100

The course content is often manageable, but , and strict expectations make it feel harder.

Online reviews call the work manageable but lecture-heavy, while an easy subject harder.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

35/100

, though a few courses allow more flexibility.

Online attendance is mixed across reviews, while or necessary to pass.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

45/100

Students recommend her only when they value structure and can handle strict rules, but many warn against her due to communication and .

Online reviews are more recently positive, while but severe warnings.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

34/100

Some reviews mention , dropped scores, or generosity, but many describe tough, inconsistent, or .

Format shift

Online grading looks clearer but strict on deadlines, while inconsistent standards.

Workload

Heavy

30/100

Students mention , and long lectures across courses.

Format shift

Online reviews mention long lectures and reports, while , and lots of homework.

Teaching experience

Average

48/100

Teaching is polarized, with praise for organization and care offset by , and weak communication.

Format shift

Online teaching reviews are more balanced and recent, while and severe negative experiences.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Assessment , and projects rather than relying on one method.

Format shift

Online reviews mention reflections, reports, tests, and a final observation, while , and projects.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

46 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are highly polarized, with strong praise for organization in some classes and , and .

Main concern

Unclear expectations and .

What students said

Her lectures are straightforward and contain ultimately everything you need for exams.
CD10G
Ruder than rude. .
CD12
, and it is NOT commensurate to student's studying.
CD10G

Remote format

Online

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews are mixed but lean more positive, with and flexible videos balanced against long lectures and no-late-work rules.

Main concern

Long lectures and strict late-work policy are the main online risks.

What students said

Really it wasn't a crazy class but you because she doesn't accept late work.
CD10G
Her lectures are long and .
CD10
Also for the online class, your time to watch the .
CD50

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam evidence is mixed, with some student-friendly elements like open-note tests or dropped scores and some reports of .

Dropped Lowest ExamOpen Note TestsObservation FinalHard Quizzes

Assessment risk

Varies

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

lectures, scantrons, and tough quizzes, but do not clearly prove a single consistent exam policy.

Open Note TestsLecture-Based ExamsScantron TestsTough Quizzes
. easy.
CD50
Only tested for exactly what was in the lectures.
CD10G
her quizes are very tough .
CD10G

Online

Online reviews mention a dropped lowest test score and an , but do not clearly prove proctoring, webcam, Lockdown Browser, or open-book rules.

Dropped Lowest TestObservation Final
She also has a policy of no late work under any circumstances but .
CD10
child for one hour and take notes of what they are doing and you basically apply the concepts of what you have learned, kinda hard but manageable.
CD10G

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

Topic is not the hardest, but the teacher makes it 50 times harder than it ought to be.

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting repeated themes in , and course format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

48/100

Her lectures are straightforward and contain ultimately everything you need for exams.

⚖️

34/100

, and it is NOT commensurate to student's studying.

📚 Workload

30/100

This class requires hours of work outside of class and you have to get a and the .

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and knowledgeable.
  • Rude, often late to class, then dashes off afterwards so you can never ask questions.
  • Does not communicate efficiently. .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Just study and try.
  • She grades hard and expects things from you that .
  • If you go to class and watch lectures you will do fine.

Theme 3

📝 About Workload

  • Get ready to read
  • This class has a lot of papers and observations, btw!
  • There are WAY TOO MANY asmnts.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

54

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

The dataset has 50 reviews across many years and courses, with enough detail to show both recent improvement and long-running negative patterns.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 511
4 out of 57
3 out of 56
2 out of 514
1 out of 516

Course coverage

CD10G15 reviews
CD5011 reviews
CD129 reviews
CD106 reviews
CD10H3 reviews
Show 6 more courses
CC021 review
CD1221 review
CD511 review
CD551 review
CDCD501 review
G101 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

15 reported outcomes

A range

7

A+ 3 · A 3 · A- 1

B range

3

B 2 · B- 1

C range

2

C+ 1 · C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 2