AI Rate Professor

English

Jamie Stock Joseph

LART211 · EWRT1 · EWRT1B · ENG211 · ENGL1A · EWRT1A · 35 lifetime ratings

AI rating
100/100
RMP rating
4.8/5
Take again
96.43%
Difficulty
2.7

The decision

Take Jamie Stock Joseph if you want a supportive English professor who makes writing manageable without making the class empty.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyCaring writing coachDetailed feedbackHighly organizedReading and essaysFair grading
  • Students consistently praise her care, organization, and .
  • The and essays, but most students still report strong grades.
  • Online and reviews giving more detail about weekly structure.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

84/100

An A is very realistic if , and essays, but it is not a zero-effort course.

Online evidence is slightly easier due to clear structure and reminders, while in-person evidence includes .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

The writing content is approachable because , though reading and .

Online reviews stress organized modules, while and feedback that make the content easier to handle.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

Attendance expectations vary across reviews, with several mandatory entries but .

Online reviews include both optional and , while in-person reviews more often mark attendance as .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

97/100

Students strongly recommend her because , and improves .

Both formats are strongly recommended, with no meaningful recommendation gap between online and in-person reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

76/100

Grades are generally fair to generous when students follow requirements, though .

Format shift

Online reviews mention clear criteria, revisions, and easy grading more often, while .

Workload

Moderate

58/100

The workload is manageable but , and several essays.

Format shift

Online reviews describe weekly prompts and quizzes, while as normal for college English.

Teaching experience

Excellent

96/100

Students repeatedly describe her as , and very helpful for writing improvement.

Format shift

Online reviews praise organization and concise lecture videos, while , and personal support.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Assessment is mainly essay and writing based, with some quizzes and .

Format shift

Online reviews mention quizzes and a timed essay final, while , and feedback.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

21 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person reviews emphasize warm teaching, useful feedback, strong class discussion, and fair but .

Main concern

Some students say and the .

What students said

“The workload was definitely manageable.”
EWRT1
“She isnt a .”
EWRT1A
“ and requires a lot of efforts.”
EWRT1A

Remote format

Online

14 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews describe an organized, feedback-heavy class with , and .

Main concern

The , and essays piling up if students fall behind.

What students said

“Her async. and a balanced workload.”
EWRT1A
“ and they're graded easily.”
EWRT1A
“It was a lot of reading. Heavy workload.”
EWRT1A

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews show mostly essay and quiz based assessment, with one online timed essay final and .

Essay-Based AssessmentReading QuizzesTimed Essay Final

Assessment risk

Standard

62/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and reading, and they do not clearly prove a .

Essay-Based AssessmentReading Responses
“Weekly quizzes and .”
EWRT1B
“only 4 essays, all of them can be revised.”
EWRT1

Online

Online reviews mention weekly quizzes, a few tests, and one timed essay final, but do .

Reading QuizzesTimed Essay FinalFew Tests
“3 essays + 1 timed essay final (easy prompts).”
EWRT1
“Expect and a and there that weren't that hard.”
EWRT1A

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ and . 100% would take her again!!”

Voice snapshots generated from 35 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

96/100

“She really does an excellent job breaking down the elements of how to write well, and makes the .”

👍 Recommendation Rate

97/100

“ and .”

⚖️

76/100

“As long as you turn in .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She so you knew how to improve.
  • She genuinely cares about her students and is willing to sit down and help you.
  • Her lectures and course materials are pleasant and adorable.

Theme 2

📚 About Workload

  • There is a lot of reading and responses, but it is an English class so that is to be expected.
  • 4 papers and a and you get used to it pretty quickly.
  • The workload was definitely manageable.

Theme 3

📈 About Grades

  • and they're graded easily.
  • She is a , but you will learn a lot from taking this course.
  • Follow her requirements for .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

35

Recent reviews read by the AI

35

Lifetime ratings

94/100

Evidence confidence

The evidence is strong because 35 reviews span many years, both formats, and highly , and workload.

Inside 35 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 531
4 out of 53
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

EWRT1A12 reviews
EWRT110 reviews
ENGL1A5 reviews
LART2114 reviews
EWRT1B3 reviews
Show 1 more courses
ENG2111 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

25 reported outcomes

A range

20

A+ 5 · A 14 · A- 1

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Not sure yet 3