AI Rate Professor

De Anza College · Administration Of Justice

Amir Alem

ADMJ90A · ADMJ3 · AJ073 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
60/100
RMP rating
3.7/5
Take again
66.67%
Difficulty
2.7

The decision

Consider Alem for online criminal justice topics if you like the subject, but be cautious because and the sample is small.

Best fit · Effort For RewardInteresting LecturesMixed Teaching QualityTest Heavy RiskParticipation MattersTextbook Concern
  • Online reviews are positive and describe interesting lectures and manageable work.
  • The only in-person review and textbook use.
  • The small sample makes the overall judgment uncertain.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

64/100

Grades can be strong, but exams, participation, and A.

Online evidence suggests the class can be easy for interested students, while poor teaching.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

67/100

Online students call the material interesting and easy, but the .

Online evidence is easier and more engaging, while the .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

20/100

as mandatory.

Both online and .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

63/100

Online students recommend him, but the .

Recommendation evidence is positive online and negative in person.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

All reported grades are solid, but one review tags him as a and test-heavy.

Format shift

Online grades look manageable, while A.

Workload

Moderate

58/100

The , and textbook expectations, but online students do not describe it as overwhelming.

Format shift

Online workload sounds manageable, while because the complaint focuses on unclear instruction.

Teaching experience

Average

62/100

Two online reviews praise interesting lectures, while the and textbook confusion.

Format shift

Online teaching evidence is positive, while .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

80/100

The clearest assessment evidence mentions four quizzes, a , and .

Format shift

, and a final, while in-person evidence tags the class as .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The and says the professor does not clearly use the textbook or .

Main concern

because explanations and .

What students said

“Doesn't fully go over the topics and leave you questioning why he even went over it in the first place.”
ADMJ3
“Doesn't even use the book in his lectures.”
ADMJ3

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

Online reviews are positive and describe , and manageable difficulty.

Main concern

, and a .

What students said

“If you are a crime junkie this class is easy peasy.”
ADMJ90A
“Kept the class really interesting with a mixture of his own lectures as well as a variety of interesting guest lecturers from the legal field.”
AJ073

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

because online reviews describe a , while the in-person review flags the class as test heavy and tough.

Four QuizzesMidtermFinalParticipation PointsTest Heavy

Assessment risk

Varies

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The in-person review tags the course as test heavy and tough, but does not .

Test HeavyTough Grader
“ ”
ADMJ3

Online

Online reviews mention four quizzes, one midterm, one final, and participation, with open-book rules.

Four QuizzesMidtermFinalParticipation Points
“There are four quizzes, 1 midterm, 1 final, and 10 possible points for participation.”
ADMJ90A

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Kept the class really interesting with a mixture of his own lectures as well as a variety of interesting guest lecturers from the legal field.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews, highlighting format differences in teaching, exams, and materials. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

62/100

“Kept the class really interesting with a mixture of his own lectures as well as a variety of interesting guest lecturers from the legal field.”

📈 Course Easiness

67/100

“If you are a crime junkie this class is easy peasy.”

⚠️ In-Person Risk

38/100

“Doesn't fully go over the topics and leave you questioning why he even went over it in the first place.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • His lectures are fun and interesting because he does talk about cases he has worked on.
  • Kept the class really interesting with a mixture of his own lectures as well as a variety of interesting guest lecturers from the legal field.
  • Doesn't fully go over the topics and leave you questioning why he even went over it in the first place.

Theme 2

🧪 About Exams And Grades

  • There are four quizzes, 1 midterm, 1 final, and 10 possible points for participation.

Theme 3

📚 About Materials

  • You do have to buy the textbook but other than that it is easy peasy.
  • This professor states that we need to buy the textbook and never uses it for the entire quarter.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

38/100

Evidence confidence

, and the online and in-person experiences conflict sharply.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ADMJ31 review
ADMJ90A1 review
AJ0731 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 1 · A- 1

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values