AI Rate Professor

De Anza College · International Studies

Miloni Gandhi

INTL5 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
20/100
RMP rating
2.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
2.0

The decision

Only consider this online class if you can work independently without lectures, rubrics, or .

Best fit · Self Taught ProMinimal instructor presenceOutdated materialsAssignment basedLow structureEasy but weak support
  • The only review reports minimal professor involvement and .
  • The student earned an A and rated difficulty low, so the class may not be hard to pass.
  • The course experience sounds weak because materials were outdated and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

82/100

The only student got an A and rated the course low difficulty, but thin.

All evidence comes from one online review; there are no in-person reviews.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

The work appears manageable because and writing assignments, but poor structure hurts clarity.

All course-easiness evidence comes from one online review only.

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

92/100

The as not mandatory and describes no office hours or lecture meetings.

Only the ; there are no in-person reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

22/100

The course is not recommended because the professor was barely involved and gave almost no guidance or feedback.

The negative recommendation is based only on one online review.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

62/100

The student earned an A, but the review says there were no rubrics or guidelines, so .

Format shift

Only one online review supports this judgment; there is .

Workload

Moderate

58/100

The workload sounds manageable, but broken or outdated sources and .

Format shift

Only the online review describes workload; in-person evidence does not exist.

Teaching experience

Poor

25/100

The review describes minimal involvement, videos, no , and outdated materials.

Format shift

Teaching evidence comes from one online review only.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

10/100

The course appears based on readings, videos, and writing assignments rather than exams.

Format shift

Only the online review mentions assessment structure.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The single online review describes an easy but poorly supported course with outdated sources and minimal instructor involvement.

Main concern

The review reports videos, office hours, rubrics, guidelines, or .

What students said

“Professor involvement was minimal - there were videos, office hours, and .”
INTL5
“ .”
INTL5

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove any exam format, proctoring rule, open-book policy, webcam rule, or .

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Online

The online review does not clearly prove any exam format, proctoring rule, open-book policy, webcam rule, or .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Professor involvement was minimal - there were videos, office hours, and .”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 review, so themes are direct but low-confidence. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

25/100

“Professor involvement was minimal - there were videos, office hours, and .”

📚 Course Materials

30/100

“ .”

⚖️

35/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Professor involvement was minimal - there were videos, office hours, and .
  • .

Theme 2

📚 About Course Materials

  • The class consisted of a list of sources to read/watch and class was taught.
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

22/100

Evidence confidence

Only one online review exists, so the signal is specific but not broad enough for high confidence.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

INTL51 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values