AI Rate Professor

De Anza College · Asian American Studies

Soo Choi

ASAMD021 · 8 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
1.9/5
Take again
12.5%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

Avoid this professor unless you , and heavy group-work risk.

Best fit · Self Taught ProConfusing QuizzesLecture HeavyTough GraderGroup ProjectsDisorganized Class
  • Most students describe the course as .
  • Grades can still be high, but students say , and .
  • Online reviews are especially negative about video lectures and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

Some students earned A-range grades, but , and opinion-based finals make the A unreliable.

Online students report confusing one-attempt quizzes, while and group projects.

Is the course easy?

Standard

43/100

The content itself may not be very hard, but , and grading style make the course feel harder.

Online difficulty comes from confusing quizzes and lecture delivery, while , and finals.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

56/100

, but several in-person reviews list mandatory attendance or participation-related pressure.

Online reviews say attendance was not mandatory, while in-person evidence is mixed with .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

18/100

Most students do not recommend him because they describe poor , and unpleasant class experiences.

Both online and clearly positive in-person review.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

18/100

because multiple students , and frustrating quiz scoring.

Format shift

, while in-person concerns focus on tough grading and opinion-based assignments.

Workload

Heavy

32/100

The workload feels heavy because students report , and few high-stakes graded items.

Format shift

Online workload is lecture and quiz heavy, while and presentations.

Teaching experience

Poor

22/100

Teaching quality is poor because most comments describe confusing, boring, disorganized, or offensive lecture experiences.

Format shift

Online teaching criticism centers on poor video delivery, while and classroom behavior.

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

Assessment mixes , and participation rather than relying on one clear format.

Format shift

Online assessment focuses on weekly quizzes and a final, while and group projects.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

6 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are mostly negative, with , and offensive lecture behavior.

Main concern

Students report , and uncomfortable class discussions.

What students said

“The other negative ratings/reviews are correct.”
ASAMD021
“He is a and not on facts about the films mentioned.”
ASAMD021
“His .”
ASAMD021

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are negative, citing weak , and frustrating one-attempt assessments.

Main concern

and poor lecture delivery.

What students said

“They have no visual it is a black screen of him talking slowly for hours.”
ASAMD021
“The way he worded his questions was FRUSTRATINGLY confusing despite most of them being T/F questions”
ASAMD021
“Only one attempt for the .”
ASAMD021

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams and quizzes are risky because students , and opinion-based finals, but proctoring rules are not clearly proven.

Weekly QuizzesOne Attempt QuizzesFinal MentionedOpinion-Based FinalsNo Clear Proctoring Evidence

Assessment risk

Strict

34/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

as opinion-based, but do not clearly prove closed-book rules or proctoring requirements.

Final MentionedOpinion-Based FinalsNo Clear Proctoring Evidence
“ and not on facts about the films mentioned.”
ASAMD021
“ .”
ASAMD021

Online

, and a final, but do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, or open-book rules.

Weekly QuizzesOne Attempt QuizzesFinal MentionedNo Clear Proctoring Evidence
“Weekly quizzes and a final.”
ASAMD021
“Only one attempt for the .”
ASAMD021

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“The other negative ratings/reviews are correct. Shame, the topic is an important one, but the teacher is quite poor.”

Voice snapshots generated from 8 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and assessment risk. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

22/100

“Didn't learn much. Quite unpleasant experience. .”

⚖️

18/100

“ .”

📝 Assessment Risk

34/100

“The way he worded his questions was FRUSTRATINGLY confusing despite most of them being T/F questions”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Lengthy and boring lectures, disappointed I didn't learn much.
  • His .
  • Didn't learn much. Quite unpleasant experience.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • He is a and not on facts about the films mentioned.
  • .
  • guaranteed to get low scores.

Theme 3

🧑‍🤝‍🧑 About Group Work

  • There are a lot of group essays and he always talks about his opinions on these films.
  • , and there are presentations every week.
  • Be prepared for group essays.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

8

Recent reviews read by the AI

8

Lifetime ratings

78/100

Evidence confidence

There are 8 recent reviews across online and in-person formats, and the negative themes are detailed and consistent.

Inside 8 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 52
1 out of 54

Course coverage

ASAMD0218 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

7 reported outcomes

A range

5

A 3 · A- 2

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C- 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Rather not say 1