AI Rate Professor

De Anza College · Child Development & Education

Sun Li W

AA01 · D010G · D012 · CD50 · CD10G · 9 lifetime ratings

AI rating
14/100
RMP rating
2.2/5
Take again
25%
Difficulty
3.8

The decision

Avoid Sun Li W unless you can learn independently, attend consistently, and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProTough GraderConfusing LecturesMandatory AttendanceFew Grade ItemsPoor Support
  • Most students describe the lectures as or unhelpful.
  • Grades feel risky because the class is graded by few things and small mistakes matter.
  • , but students still report limited learning value.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

Passing is possible if you show up and do the work, but and few chances to recover.

because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

34/100

The content is not always described as complex, but unclear lectures and .

because there are no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

as mandatory or say skipping class can hurt your grade.

because there are no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

22/100

Most students would not take her again because they , and low learning value.

because there are no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

18/100

Students repeatedly call her a and say small mistakes or few grade items can hurt the .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

42/100

The workload is not always described as huge, but , and few grade items make it feel stressful.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Poor

24/100

Most comments describe lectures as boring, confusing, repetitive, or unhelpful despite a few positive notes.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

, and few grade items rather than one clear assessment type.

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

9 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are mostly negative, with , and weak support.

Main concern

Students may pass, but many say they learn little and .

What students said

“Her lectures are boring and repetitive.”
CD50
“I found her lectures very .”
CD10G
“very inconsistent Personality: : Tough and unfair”
D010G

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

, but they do not clearly prove proctoring, open-book rules, or .

Tests Based on LecturesStudy RequiredPolicy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Standard

42/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and lecture-based material, but .

Tests Based on LecturesStudy Required
“i felt she tested us more on her lectures than the chapters it self.”
CD10G
“The if you studied”
CD50

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“very inconsistent Personality: : Tough and !”

Voice snapshots generated from 9 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and support. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

24/100

“I found her lectures very .”

⚖️

18/100

“Tough and unfair”

🚫 Recommendation

22/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Her lectures are boring and repetitive.
  • She never made sense.
  • I found her lectures very .

Theme 2

📈 About Grades

  • if you slacked even a little bit your grade will go down because there isn't much in the grade book.
  • She is meticulous.
  • IF YOU WANT .

Theme 3

❤️ About Support

  • Not much student helpful, Not clear with
  • she answered my questions in an anxious, demeaning and hostile way.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

9

Recent reviews read by the AI

9

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

There are 9 reviews across many years with consistent negative themes, but several reviews are old and .

Inside 9 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 53
1 out of 54

Course coverage

CD10G3 reviews
CD503 reviews
AA011 review
D010G1 review
D0121 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

1

A+ 1

B range

2

B+ 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1