AI Rate Professor

Political Science

Evan Low

POLI1 · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating
76/100
RMP rating
3.8/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
2.7

The decision

if you want a practical, speaker-driven political science class and can tolerate uneven structure.

Best fit · Effort For RewardCharismatic LecturerPractical PoliticsGuest SpeakersMixed Clarity
  • Most positive reviews praise his charisma, practical knowledge, and guest speakers.
  • A minority of reviews describe the class as dull or poorly connected to course goals.
  • Grade evidence is limited but suggests a moderate path to a good grade.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

68/100

Grades include A, A-, B+, and B, but comments do not prove that high grades require minimal effort.

All grade and .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

63/100

Several students found the course practical and engaging, but difficulty ratings vary widely and one review rated it very hard.

, so there is no online comparison.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

, so flexibility cannot be confirmed.

All reviews are in person, and none clearly prove an .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

74/100

Most comments are positive about his energy and practical experience, but two low-quality ratings create real caution.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

62/100

The available grades are mostly solid, but there .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

58/100

Comments focus more on lectures and guest speakers than workload, so the workload appears moderate but not well proven.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Good

72/100

Students often call him inspirational and practical, but one detailed review says the teaching felt useless and disconnected.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Reviews do not clearly describe whether .

Format shift

Only in-person reviews exist, and they do not clearly prove assessment structure.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

All evidence is from in-person POLI1 reviews, with praise for practical lectures but some sharp complaints about usefulness.

Main concern

Some students felt the guest speakers were not clearly tied to the class.

What students said

“Inspirational and charismatic ! Really knows his stuff.”
POLI1
“Most of the classmates thought it was a dull class.”
POLI1
“Real practical lecturing and facts with lots of famous people guest speaking”
POLI1

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the .

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

format, proctoring, or .

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Inspirational and charismatic ! Really knows his stuff.”

Voice snapshots generated from 6 reviews, highlighting teaching style, practical value, and consistency. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

72/100

“Inspirational and charismatic ! Really knows his stuff.”

⚖️ Mixed Experience

55/100

“Most of the classmates thought it was a dull class.”

🧭 Practical Value

74/100

“I didnt like politics before but now I want to get more involved.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Inspirational and charismatic ! Really knows his stuff.
  • Heard about this professor and wanted to learn practical experience.
  • Engaging in the early 7:30am course with practical knowledge.. Less theoretical

Theme 2

🎤 About Guest Speakers

  • Real practical lecturing and facts with lots of famous people guest speaking
  • Brought in guest speakers like the founder of match.com, mayors and community leaders.
  • Brings in guest lecturers, such as elected officials & CEO's, but haven't made the connection on why thats important to the class.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

6

Recent reviews read by the AI

6

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

The sample has only six reviews, spans many years, and contains conflicting quality ratings.

Inside 6 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

POLI16 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 1 · A- 1

B range

2

B+ 1 · B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values