AI Rate Professor

De Anza College · Intercultural Studies

Jessica Hamilton

HIST29A · DO16B · ICS16A · HIST16B · ICS11 · 10 lifetime ratings

AI rating
35/100
RMP rating
2.8/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
2.6

The decision

Take Hamilton only if and writing with .

Best fit · Effort For RewardReading HeavyPaper HeavyDelayed GradingMixed TeachingOnline Risk
  • Online reviews are mostly , and limited professor effort.
  • and describe the class as interesting if students do the work.
  • The course is not clearly hard in content, but the , and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

Grades can be high, but students repeatedly say the A , and assignment completion.

Online evidence shows more effort and grading anxiety, while .

Is the course easy?

Standard

54/100

The content is manageable, but the course feels harder because of , and .

Online reviews describe a standard but work-heavy setup, while and easier.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

70/100

Online reviews explicitly say attendance was not mandatory, while .

Attendance flexibility is supported mainly by online reviews; .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

35/100

Recent online reviewers mostly would not retake her, despite several older in-person students enjoying the class.

Online evidence is clearly negative, while and more positive.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

40/100

Students report , and grading tied to the professor's expectations.

Format shift

Online reviews show the , while .

Workload

Heavy

25/100

, and videos appear often enough to make the workload heavy.

Format shift

Both formats mention heavy work, but online reviews sound more frustrated by it.

Teaching experience

Poor

42/100

Teaching quality and newer online complaints about low effort and .

Format shift

Online teaching evidence is weak, while as knowledgeable and helpful.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

The course appears driven , and quizzes more than exams.

Format shift

Online reviews emphasize assignments and quizzes, while , and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

but more positive, with students praising her knowledge while still noting lots of reading and writing.

Main concern

The workload can be heavier than expected even when students like the class.

What students said

“Lots of reading and and more writing than in my English class”
HIST29A
“Easy class that's interesting and relevant.”
HIST16B
“easy A. she has and the questions come directly from those review.”
ICS16A

Remote format

Online

5 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online students report , and low confidence in feedback.

Main concern

Delayed or .

What students said

“ !”
HIST16B
“Discussions and reading, which is excessive”
ICS11
“Difficulty wise the class Is easy, but make sure you have the same outlook on history as the professor”
DO16B

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove a stable exam policy, though one online review mentions essay quizzes and .

Essay QuizzesReview-Based ExamsNo Clear Proctoring Evidence

Assessment risk

Varies

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

but do not clearly prove book policy, proctoring, midterm, or final format.

Review Sections Before Exams
“she has and the questions come directly from those review”
ICS16A

Online

Online reviews mention quizzes with essays but do not clearly .

Essay QuizzesNo Clear Proctoring Evidence
“even the ”
ICS11

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“You might as well go for the A if you are already working this hard.”

Voice snapshots generated from 10 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: Medium.

📚 Workload Reality

25/100

“Discussions and reading, which is excessive”

⚖️

40/100

“ !”

👨‍🏫 Mixed Teaching

42/100

“Jessica is young and very knowledgeable.”

Theme 1

📚 About Workload

  • Lots of reading and and more writing than in my English class
  • Too many things to do in her class.
  • Her online Africa class makes you upload videos each week

Theme 2

⚖️ About Grades

  • !
  • it will be hard to get an A.
  • easy A. she has

Theme 3

👨‍🏫 About Teaching

  • I love her and her class!
  • Laziness throughout the course with minimal effort from the professor.
  • she is honest and has respect for whatever you believe in.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

10

Recent reviews read by the AI

10

Lifetime ratings

70/100

Evidence confidence

Ten reviews give usable format evidence, but and recommendation data is incomplete.

Inside 10 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 53
1 out of 53

Course coverage

HIST16B4 reviews
ICS112 reviews
ICS16A2 reviews
DO16B1 review
HIST29A1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

2

A+ 1 · A 1

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 1