AI Rate Professor

De Anza College · English As A Second Language

Matthew Culver

ESL265 · ESL263 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
91/100
RMP rating
4.5/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
2.5

The decision

if you want a , but treat the rating as low-sample evidence.

Best fit · Effort For RewardEasy gradingAmazing lecturesGood feedbackClear gradingGroup projects
  • and describe a positive classroom experience.
  • he grades easily.
  • Evidence is limited because there .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

82/100

The A looks attainable because one student says he grades easily and the two reported grades are B+ and A.

.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

70/100

The course seems manageable because , and strong lectures, but ESL263 still had moderate difficulty.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

95/100

.

.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

95/100

and describe the class positively.

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

86/100

because one review directly says he grades easily and .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

68/100

Workload is not clearly described, though group projects and .

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Excellent

88/100

The limited , and .

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

Reviews mention group projects and feedback, while .

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are positive and , and strong lectures.

Main concern

The review set is small and gives little detail about workload or exams.

What students said

“ .”
ESL265
“ !”
ESL263

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, open-book policy, midterm format, or .

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

or .

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ .”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting key themes in grading and teaching with limited evidence. Credibility rating: Low.

⚖️

86/100

“ .”

🎯 Teaching Quality

88/100

“ !”

👍 Recommendation Rate

95/100

“ !”

Theme 1

📈 About Grades

  • .
  • !

Theme 2

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • !
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

48/100

Evidence confidence

, and both are short, so the signal is positive but thin.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ESL2631 review
ESL2651 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values