AI Rate Professor

English As A Second Language

Ebru Demir

ESL262 · ESL272 · ESL261 · ESL41983 · D244 · ESL273 · 9 lifetime ratings

AI rating
8/100
RMP rating
1.4/5
Take again
22.22%
Difficulty
4.6

The decision

unless you have no other option and can handle heavy work with .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough graderHeavy homeworkTest heavyMandatory attendanceLow student support
  • , and weak teaching support.
  • as mandatory, but students often say class time does not help enough.
  • The grade evidence is poor, with two reported F grades and repeated complaints about low grades after hard work.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

12/100

Getting an A appears very hard because , and heavy work even after effort.

because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

The course content is made , and poor classroom teaching support.

All course .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

5/100

reviews.

Only in-person reviews exist, and .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

18/100

Most students because of , and weak teaching.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

10/100

Students repeatedly call her a and report bad grades despite hard work.

Format shift

.

Workload

Overwhelming

10/100

Reviews describe weekly videos, quizzes, papers, and .

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Awful

15/100

Most comments say she does not teach clearly, lacks support, or creates a bad class experience.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

Reviews repeatedly mention test-heavy , and .

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

9 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews are strongly negative, with repeated complaints about , and poor teaching.

Main concern

Students report working hard but still receiving low grades and .

What students said

“ ; she is very hard with getting and not very considering with students.”
ESL273
“She just gave us a bunch of homework and did not teach us in the class.”
ESL272
“we worked hard. but at the end low grade and so on.”
ESL273

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and , but they do not clearly prove open-book rules, proctoring, or closed-book requirements.

Midterm QuizFinal QuizTest Heavy

Assessment risk

Standard

42/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and test-heavy grading, but exam rules are not clearly proven.

Midterm QuizFinal QuizTest Heavy
“ and .”
ESL261
“ ”
ESL273

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ ; she is very hard with getting and not very considering with students.”

Voice snapshots generated from 9 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and attendance. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

15/100

“She just gave us a bunch of homework and did not teach us in the class.”

⚖️

10/100

“we worked hard. but at the end low grade and so on.”

📚 Workload Pressure

10/100

“This listening and speaking class has a lot of .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She just gave us a bunch of homework and did not teach us in the class.
  • she has not passion in

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • bad teacher ,she grade everyone is hard.
  • we worked hard. but at the end low grade and so on.

Theme 3

📚 About Workload

  • This listening and speaking class has a lot of .
  • pity for you, and doesn't give you time to write during lectures.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

9

Recent reviews read by the AI

9

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Nine reviews across several years show a consistent negative pattern in , and teaching quality.

Inside 9 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 57

Course coverage

ESL2733 reviews
ESL2612 reviews
D2441 review
ESL2621 review
ESL2721 review
Show 1 more courses
ESL419831 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

6 reported outcomes

A range

1

A+ 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

2

F 2

No letter grade reported

3

Not sure yet 3