AI Rate Professor

De Anza College · Child Development & Education

Jila Maleksalehi

CD67CD12CD59H · CD64 · CD42543 · CD68 · CD54 · CD50ANDCD54 · CD10H · CD50 · CD12 · CD12CD10H · CD10G · CD61 · D067 · PSYCD010H · CD12ANDCD10H · 70 lifetime ratings

AI rating
97/100
RMP rating
4.8/5
Take again
95.12%
Difficulty
2.5

The decision

Take her if you want a with strong learning and strong grades.

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaring MentorInteractive ClassesClear RubricsHigh Effort RewardedAssignment Heavy
  • Students overwhelmingly describe her as caring, available, inspiring, and deeply supportive.
  • The course is not always light because , and participation matter.
  • Clear rubrics and put in steady effort.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

80/100

A strong grade is very achievable, but students repeatedly say it requires following rubrics, participating, and completing detailed work.

Both formats support high grades with effort, while online reviews stress rubrics and and projects.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

64/100

The concepts are approachable because , but workload, citation, grammar, and group work add real challenge.

Online reviews describe structure and pacing as helpful, while .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

22/100

as mandatory, and comments show participation is central to the class experience.

Both formats show attendance or active participation expectations, with online reviews also mentioning cameras in class.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

96/100

Students recommend her because , and willing to help students improve.

Both formats are strongly positive, with in-person reviews providing broader and deeper evidence.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

74/100

and clear, but she can be strict about citations, grammar, and assignment quality.

Format shift

Online reviews emphasize rubrics and APA help, while and .

Workload

Moderate

48/100

The workload is meaningful and sometimes heavy, especially papers, projects, group activities, citation, and end-of-quarter work.

Format shift

, while online reviews focus more on organization and support.

Teaching experience

Excellent

96/100

Students consistently describe her as caring, inspiring, structured, engaging, and available outside class.

Format shift

Both formats show excellent teaching, with online reviews highlighting organization and in-person reviews highlighting classroom energy.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

24/100

Assessment is driven , and participation rather than exams.

Format shift

Online reviews mention rubrics and APA assignments, while , and class activities.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

44 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with repeated praise for , and meaningful projects.

Main concern

The main , and participation.

What students said

“She gave lots of homework and pretty demanding about the , but as long as you follow her instructions, work with all your hearts, and participate, you’ll learn a lot and succeed her class.”
CD50
“It's not an easy class, but !”
CD68
“Easy A if you try but you will be left with things you won't learn from a text book.”
CD10H

Remote format

Online

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews are strongly positive and , and supportive help.

Main concern

Online students should follow rubrics closely and communicate when they need help.

What students said

“She provides clearly structured modules well in advance, allowing students to progress at their own pace.”
D067
“She grades directly from her rubrics and will offer any help she can especially with APA format.”
D067
“She like everone to have there cameras on but is a fun class.”
CD10G

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and mostly describe projects, papers, rubrics, and assignments rather than exam rules.

Limited Exam Policy EvidenceProjects Over TestsRubric-Based Assignments

Assessment risk

Varies

68/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews mention some tests and reviews, but , and projects.

Projects And PapersTests Mentioned In Some ReviewsReview Before Test
“What I like about her is that .”
CD10G
“There's a review during class before a test and it's very similar to the actual tests!”
CD10H

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove online exam rules, webcam exam proctoring, Lockdown Browser, or open-book policy.

No Clear Online Exam PolicyRubric-Based Assignments
“She grades directly from her rubrics and will offer any help she can especially with APA format.”
D067
“She like everone to have there cameras on but is a fun class.”
CD10G

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Honestly, Ms Malek is the .”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 , and support themes. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

96/100

“She truly cares about , and creates a respectful, engaging classroom.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

96/100

“I've taken 3 classes with her and .”

⚖️ Effort And Grades

80/100

“Easy A if you try but you will be left with things you won't learn from a text book.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Her teaching style is student-centered and interactive.
  • She makes learning FUN!
  • She makes you connect with the class so well and you will leave with so much knowledge.

Theme 2

📈 About Work And Grades

  • At first, I was overwhelmed with so many assignments, but looking back, it’s the only way to make me study in the short period of the quarterly term.
  • She is very strict on citation so do it in the correct format.
  • If you stay on top of your work, you will do great!

Theme 3

❤️ About Support

  • She really does care for her students and understands that life happens.
  • She is very communicative and flexible.
  • She mentors her students, offering guidance and support beyond the classroom to help them achieve their desired goals.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

70

Lifetime ratings

91/100

Evidence confidence

The judgment is credible because it uses 50 reviews with strong consistency across years, though only 6 are online reviews.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 566
4 out of 52
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

CD10H12 reviews
CD129 reviews
CD10G6 reviews
CD505 reviews
D0675 reviews
Show 11 more courses
CD542 reviews
CD682 reviews
425411 review
CD12ANDCD10H1 review
CD12CD10H1 review
CD425431 review
CD50ANDCD541 review
CD611 review
CD641 review
CD67CD12CD59H1 review
PSYCD010H1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

38 reported outcomes

A range

31

A+ 12 · A 18 · A- 1

B range

3

B+ 1 · B 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

4

Drop/Withdrawal 3 · Not sure yet 1