AI Rate Professor

De Anza College · Chemistry

Daria Eiteneer

CHEM1A · PHYS4B · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
30/100
RMP rating
2.7/5
Take again
33.33%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

Avoid unless you can handle disorganized online structure, changing expectations, and heavy self-management.

Best fit · Self Taught ProUnorganized structureChanging gradingSlow communicationLots of homeworkExtra credit
  • The small review set is mixed, but two of three students strongly criticize organization and consistency.
  • Students can still earn A-range grades, but the process feels unstable and communication is weak.
  • All evidence is from online classes, so there is .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

A-range grades appear possible, but students describe lots of , and changing expectations.

All evidence comes from online reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

The content and assessments are manageable for some students, but poor organization makes the course feel harder.

Only online evidence exists, and issues.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

20/100

as mandatory, and one tag says participation matters.

; there are zero in-person reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

33/100

because organization, grading consistency, and communication were weak.

The recommendation score is based only on online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

25/100

Grades can be high, but students report and .

Format shift

Only online reviews discuss grading, and they .

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Students mention lots of , and assignments that do not clearly match lectures.

Format shift

All workload evidence is online, with no in-person workload evidence.

Teaching experience

Poor

40/100

One student praises her teaching, but two describe serious problems with organization, consistency, and responsiveness.

Format shift

Only online teaching evidence exists, and it is sharply mixed.

Assessment method

Balanced

60/100

Assessment , and labs, with no single dominant method proven.

Format shift

Online reviews mention quizzes, tests, homework, Chem 101 assignments, and virtual labs.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are mixed, with one strong positive review outweighed by complaints about organization, communication, and .

Main concern

Course structure and .

What students said

“So unorganized and inconsistent, and she said she would do lots of things but never did even after being asked about it several times.”
CHEM1A
“Prepare for the .”
CHEM1A

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention quizzes and tests, but they do not clearly prove open-book rules, webcam use, Lockdown Browser, or strict proctoring.

QuizzesTestsHomework Alignment IssuesNo Clear Proctoring Evidence

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Online

Online reviews mention quizzes, tests, and delayed test sending, but .

QuizzesTestsDelayed TestsNo Clear Proctoring Evidence
“Quizzes, tests, and .”
PHYS4B
“She was behind in grading and .”
CHEM1A

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Prepare for the .”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and teaching; credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

40/100

“Professor Eiteneer is one of the .”

⚠️ Organization Risk

25/100

“So unorganized and inconsistent, and she said she would do lots of things but never did even after being asked about it several times.”

📈 Grade Effort

62/100

“Prepare for the .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Prerecorded lectures (which are provided) are much better than in class lectures.
  • Lecture content didn't really and quizzes/exams.

Theme 2

📋 About Organization

  • but was fixed fairly quickly.
  • So unorganized and inconsistent, and she said she would do lots of things but never did even after being asked about it several times.
  • Daria will change the course structure throughout the quarter.

Theme 3

📈 About Grades & Work

  • Quizzes, tests, and .
  • Assignments through Chem 101, something you have to pay for.
  • Prepare for the .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

38/100

Evidence confidence

Only , and the evidence is recent enough but too small for high confidence.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 50

Course coverage

CHEM1A2 reviews
PHYS4B1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

3

A 2 · A- 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values