AI Rate Professor

Physics

Sewan Fan

PHYS2A · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
4/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
4.2

The decision

Avoid this professor unless and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProUnclear TeachingHarsh GradingTest HeavyLow SupportHigh Stress
  • and poor support.
  • Grades and tricky questions.
  • Online evidence is uniformly .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Some students earned A grades, but comments describe trick questions, few graded items, and , so the A is not low-effort.

All evidence comes from Online reviews, with no In person reviews available.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

24/100

The course feels difficult because students report , and little useful practice.

Only Online reviews exist, and they consistently describe the course as confusing.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

68/100

Most online reviews , but .

Online evidence is mixed, while In person evidence is unavailable.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

3/100

Students overwhelmingly warn against taking him because of , and harsh testing.

The recommendation evidence comes only from Online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

12/100

Students repeatedly mention tough grading, few graded items, trick questions, and no late work.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

The number of assignments may be small, but , and tests as stressful and poorly supported.

Format shift

Only Online reviews discuss workload.

Teaching experience

Awful

8/100

Reviews repeatedly say he does , and responds poorly to students.

Format shift

All teaching evidence is Online and consistently negative.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

88/100

Students describe the grade as , and few graded items.

Format shift

Online reviews consistently describe a test-heavy structure.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Remote format

Online

5 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are consistently negative, citing unclear lectures, poor help, and .

Main concern

Students say the class requires self-teaching and has harsh high-stakes assessments.

What students said

“Doesn't actually teach anything, just rambles on about random stuff and .”
PHYS2A
“No late work no practice problems 6 question weekly HWs w/o common sense.”
PHYS2A
“ !”
PHYS2A

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The exams are stressful and high-stakes, but one online review explicitly says they are not proctored.

Not ProctoredShort MidtermsTest HeavyFew Graded Items

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Online

, and one clear note that exams are not proctored.

Not ProctoredShort MidtermsTest Heavy
“Grade is heavily based on 10-question midterms, so there's lots of stress on doing well.”
PHYS2A
“A silver lining is they're not proctored.”
PHYS2A

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ and the class.”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and support. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

8/100

“Doesn't actually teach, rambles w poorly drawn slides, attendance isn't graded, is a waste of time.”

⚖️

12/100

“ ”

⚠️ Recommendation Warning

3/100

“ !”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Doesn't actually teach anything, just rambles on about random stuff and .
  • Lectures suck he just reads the slides.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Grade is heavily based on 10-question midterms, so there's lots of stress on doing well.
  • 10 question midterm, fail 2 trick questions and fail.

Theme 3

🚩 About Student Support

  • refuses to help

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

72/100

Evidence confidence

Five recent Online reviews are highly consistent, but there is no In person evidence.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 55

Course coverage

PHYS2A5 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

3

A+ 1 · A 2

B range

1

B- 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1