Is this an easy A?
EasyA
83/100Many students report easy A grades, but the A , and self-teaching when directions are unclear.
Online reviews directly call it an easy A, while but serious risk for students who need clear instruction.
FTV63B · FTV30A · FTV30 · FTV63A · FILM63A · FTV31 · FTV63 · 22 lifetime ratings
The decision
Key questions
Is this an easy A?
Many students report easy A grades, but the A can depend on attendance, project follow-through, and self-teaching when directions are unclear.
Online reviews directly call it an easy A, while in-person reviews show easy grades for some but serious risk for students who need clear instruction.
Is the course easy?
The course content is manageable, but ProTools, sound recording, equipment logistics, and unclear directions make it harder for beginners.
Online comments make the class sound easier, while in-person comments show more friction from projects, equipment, and prior skill expectations.
Is attendance flexible?
Many reviews say attendance is required, participation matters, or skipping class can hurt because of pop quizzes and in-class work.
Online and in-person reviews both include mandatory attendance signals, with stronger evidence from in-person pop quizzes and participation tags.
Is this professor recommended?
Students recommend him only if you value his industry knowledge and can tolerate old-school organization and unclear teaching.
Online reviews are positive, but in-person reviews are split enough to keep the overall recommendation at Depends.
Course guide
Grading
Fair
66/100
Grades often look easy, but unclear project criteria and a reported failing experience prevent calling the grading fully generous.
Format shift
Online grading looks easy, while in-person grading depends more on project execution and understanding vague requirements.
Workload
Moderate
48/100
Workload is mostly projects, readings, quizzes, and equipment logistics rather than constant heavy exams.
Format shift
Online workload is lighter, while in-person FTV30 and FTV63A reviews mention weekly projects, readings, and stressful gear reservations.
Teaching experience
Average
48/100
He is respected for sound expertise, but many students say he is disorganized, unclear, lecture-heavy, or poor at teaching beginners.
Format shift
Online reviews describe a caring professor, while in-person reviews are much more divided about his classroom teaching.
Assessment method
FocusOnAssignments
34/100
Assessment appears centered on projects, group work, exercises, presentations, and occasional quizzes.
Format shift
Online reviews mention discussion and participation, while in-person reviews repeatedly mention projects, exercises, pop quizzes, and presentations.
Luni fit check
Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.
Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.
Course format
Classroom format
High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro
In-person reviews are polarized, with some praising his expertise and others warning about confusing projects and weak teaching structure.
Main concern
Students may need prior ProTools or sound-design confidence to avoid getting lost.
What students said
“Instructions for projects were extremely unclear, ended up failing because he did not explain how to do the final project.”
“Haack assumes you have prior knowledge of ProTools before beginning class.”
“He's very passionate about the subject and very knowledgeable of the art of sound.”
Remote format
Medium confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter
Online reviews are strongly positive and describe easy A outcomes with a caring, old-fashioned professor.
Main concern
He may not use Canvas, so students must manage grades and communication manually.
What students said
“received easy A in both classes.”
“It is an easy A class but you could also learn something from the class.”
Exam style
Reviews mention pop quizzes and project work, but do not clearly prove major exam format, proctoring, open-book rules, or final exam policy.
Assessment risk
Standard
55/100
Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.
In-person reviews clearly mention pop quizzes and project-based work, but do not clearly prove major exam or final policy.
“attendance is required cause he makes a pop quiz every now and then.”
“Expect a chapter of reading, a quiz, and a project per week.”
Online reviews do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, open-book, quiz format, midterm, or final policy.
Student evidence
Top student voice
“He is really great!! He cares about the students and always be willing to answer any questions.”
“Hes passionate about sound, and hes good at it. Problem is he sucks at teaching it to you.”
“It is an easy A class but you could also learn something from the class.”
“Projects are confusing, his criteria is confusing.”
Theme 1
Theme 2
Theme 3
Data context
Analysis sample
23
Recent reviews read by the AI
22
Lifetime ratings
72/100
Evidence confidence
Credibility is medium because 23 reviews provide detailed but highly polarized evidence across different courses and years.
Inside 23 stored ratings
Reported outcomes
12 reported outcomes
A+ 4 · A 3 · A- 1
No reported values
No reported values
No reported values
F 1
Not sure yet 3