AI Rate Professor

De Anza College · Counseling

Yolanda Johnson

CLP5 · COUNSELING1 · CLP70 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
94/100
RMP rating
4.3/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
1.7

The decision

if you want a .

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyCaring CounselorHelpful Career GuidanceLow DifficultyParticipation Helps
  • Students consistently describe her as caring, kind, and helpful.
  • The course workload and difficulty appear low, with A grades reported.
  • The online review is more muted and says the class feels useful mainly for students with .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

88/100

Reported A grades and low difficulty suggest an A is realistic with basic work and participation.

Online evidence shows an A in a low-difficulty class, while and participation are enough.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

78/100

The content appears practical and low difficulty, though usefulness depends on career clarity.

, while in-person reviews emphasize support and ease.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

75/100

, while in-person comments suggest participation helps.

Online attendance is optional, and rule.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

95/100

because she is caring and helpful.

online review, which is positive but restrained.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

85/100

Grades look favorable, and comments say students should be fine if they complete work and participate.

Format shift

, but in-person evidence is more detailed.

Workload

Light

82/100

Reviews describe low difficulty and basic .

Format shift

Online and .

Teaching experience

Excellent

88/100

Students mainly praise her care, reliability, kindness, and helpfulness.

Format shift

In-person reviews are highly enthusiastic, while the online review is only mildly positive.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

The and participation than exams.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

and say students should do fine by working and participating.

Main concern

Participation matters, but no major concern is repeated.

What students said

“She's an , and reliable.”
COUNSELING1
“Just do your work on time and participate in class and you should be fine!”
CLP70

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The online review says the class is easy but only moderately useful unless the student already has career direction.

Main concern

The class may feel mediocre without a .

What students said

“Eh, this class was mediocre.”
CLP5
“The part about writing resumes and though.”
CLP5

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the .

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The policy.

Online

The online review does .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She's an , and reliable.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews, highlighting key themes in support, usefulness, and grade effort; credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

88/100

“She's an , and reliable.”

👍 Recommendation Strength

95/100

“Yolanda is awesome! Shes so nice, caring, and helpful!”

📈 Grade Effort

88/100

“Just do your work on time and participate in class and you should be fine!”

Theme 1

❤️ About Support

  • She's an , and reliable.
  • Yolanda is awesome! Shes so nice, caring, and helpful!

Theme 2

📈 About Ease & Value

  • Just do your work on time and participate in class and you should be fine!
  • The part about writing resumes and though.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

45/100

Evidence confidence

Only 3 reviews are available, and the evidence is old and limited despite consistent positive tone.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

CLP51 review
CLP701 review
COUNSELING11 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values