AI Rate Professor

Computer Information Systems

Karina Dundurs

CIS04 · CISD003 · CIS003 · CISD004 · D002 · CIS002 · CIS3 · CIS004 · CIS2 · 21 lifetime ratings

AI rating
19/100
RMP rating
2.1/5
Take again
30%
Difficulty
3.4

The decision

Avoid her online sections unless , and mainly want credit over support.

Best fit · Self Taught ProPoor communicationDisorganized CanvasSelf-taught courseHeavy workloadMixed grading
  • Online students overwhelmingly , and little teaching.
  • A criteria and grade improvement opportunities.
  • The course can sometimes be an easy A, but many students report frustration, withdrawals, and low learning value.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

Some students report easy grades or , but and poor support make the A stressful and unreliable.

Online evidence includes an easy A comment but also withdrawals and failures, while .

Is the course easy?

Standard

42/100

The content appears introductory, but weak organization and should.

Online sections feel harder because of poor Canvas setup and missing guidance, while but manageable concepts.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

65/100

Several online reviews say attendance is not mandatory, but as required.

Online , while in-person evidence includes both optional and mandatory reports.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

28/100

because , and course organization are major problems.

Online reviews are strongly negative, while and somewhat better.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

35/100

Some students mention correction opportunities, but many describe confusing .

Format shift

Online grading is described as unclear and inconsistent, while .

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Reviews frequently mention lots of , and uneven weekly loads.

Format shift

Online reviews show the strongest workload complaints, while but , and projects.

Teaching experience

Awful

22/100

Most reviews say she does .

Format shift

Online teaching experience is overwhelmingly negative, while outliers.

Assessment method

Balanced

48/100

Reviews mention homework, discussions, projects, papers, tests, and .

Format shift

Online reviews emphasize assignments and reading, while in-person reviews mention tests, projects, and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

but more positive than online, with and chances to improve assignments.

Main concern

Even in person, some students report poor teaching, unavailable support, and .

What students said

“Allows you to .”
CIS003
“ and very knowledgeable in the topic.”
CIS004
“You will not learn anything.”
CISD003

Remote format

Online

16 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are mostly negative, citing no lectures, , and low learning.

Main concern

Students often feel abandoned and forced to teach themselves.

What students said

“Since there are no zoom meetings you basically teach yourself the course”
CIS002
“The .”
CIS04
“Her Canvas is a mess, no assignment schedule, no .”
CISD004

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention tests and , but they do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, open-book, or take-home policies.

Tests MentionedPoint SystemNo Clear Proctoring EvidenceNo Clear Open-Book Evidence

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, but do not clearly prove whether exams are open-book, closed-book, or proctored.

Tests Mentioned
“the and be impossible to do well on”
CISD003

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove proctoring, webcam, .

No Clear Proctoring EvidenceNo Clear Open-Book Evidence

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Since there are no zoom meetings you basically teach yourself the course”

Voice snapshots generated from 21 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and workload. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

22/100

“She does not teach.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

28/100

“If you are thinking about taking this professor, my advise is DON'T.”

⚖️

35/100

“If she feels like it, she will give you an , but not always.”

Theme 1

💻 About Online Organization

  • The Online organization was messy and hard to navigate.
  • Her Canvas is a mess, no assignment schedule, no .
  • It is mind blowing that a computer science teacher does not .

Theme 2

📩 About Communication

  • There is no communication between her and students, no layout of the material or feedback.
  • Professor never responded to emails for support/direction

Theme 3

📈 About Grades And Work

  • Easy A but 0 learning here.
  • Gives two weeks to complete assignments and .
  • The course will be nothing for one week and the next week will be a harsh load.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

21

Recent reviews read by the AI

21

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

The analysis uses 21 reviews with strong consistency in online complaints and enough format split .

Inside 21 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 515

Course coverage

CIS0025 reviews
CIS044 reviews
CIS0043 reviews
CIS0032 reviews
CIS22 reviews
Show 4 more courses
CISD0042 reviews
CIS31 review
CISD0031 review
D0021 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

8 reported outcomes

A range

2

A+ 1 · A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

1

D 1

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

4

Drop/Withdrawal 3 · Not sure yet 1