AI Rate Professor

Humanities

Reann Ramsey

HIST101 · HISTORY1 · HIST017A · HUM01 · HIST238 · 12 lifetime ratings

AI rating
71/100
RMP rating
3.8/5
Take again
63.64%
Difficulty
2.5

The decision

Take her if and writing for a fair reward, but if you need a light online class.

Best fit · Effort For RewardOrganized online classHelpful feedbackHeavy writingFair but demandingPolarized reviews
  • Recent online reviews are very positive about organization, support, and .
  • Negative reviews focus on heavy , and .
  • Grades can be high, but several students say the workload is too large for the reward.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

68/100

Many students earned A-range grades, but comments repeatedly say the , and time.

and heavy-work complaints, while the only in-person review directly says it is not an easy A.

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

Some sections feel easy and , but and writing-heavy.

Online evidence varies by course, while the as difficult but fair.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

35/100

Most records mark attendance as mandatory, but at least .

Online attendance evidence is mixed but , while the as mandatory.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

68/100

and supportive, but several warn against the workload and feedback quality.

Online reviews are strongly split, while the but cautious.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

Some students call her an , but and limited full credit.

Format shift

Online reviews conflict on grading leniency, while the .

Workload

Heavy

35/100

Repeated comments describe lots of reading, writing, papers, and .

Format shift

The heavy-workload concern is strongest online, and the lot of work.

Teaching experience

Good

76/100

Many recent students praise her organization, feedback, and support, but older and .

Format shift

Online teaching evidence is polarized, while the and resources.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

, and assignments more than traditional exams.

Format shift

Online comments provide most assessment evidence, while the and material learning.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

The only in-person review says the class is difficult but fair and resource-supported.

Main concern

It is not an easy A in person.

What students said

“Although a difficult class due to the amount of reading and work given, it is apparent this teacher is fair.”
HIST101
“ ”
HIST101

Remote format

Online

10 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews are polarized, with many recent students praising organization and support while older reviews complain about too much writing and .

Main concern

The biggest online risk is heavy writing and .

What students said

“ and open from the start”
HIST017A
“Very repetitive and .”
HIST101
“Each week required tons of reading, writing, and long lectures”
HIST017A

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention exams and a final, but do not clearly prove proctoring, open-book rules, webcam use, or closed-book rules.

Writing-Heavy ExamsFinal MentionedPolicy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The policy.

Online

Online reviews mention exams and a final but .

Writing-Heavy ExamsFinal Mentioned
“Too much writing for one class, an online class albeit, especially for the exams.”
HIST101
“this did not even prepare you for the test”
HIST017A
“I had no idea if I was passing or failing.”
HIST017A

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ will need to learn the material and work hard.”

Voice snapshots generated from 11 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and workload. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

76/100

“She is a well spoken and funny teacher that gave engaging lectures and assignments.”

📚 Workload Reality

35/100

“Each week required tons of reading, writing, and long lectures”

⚖️

58/100

“Overall, the and you will have resources for help.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • This was the
  • and understanding.
  • She is a well spoken and funny teacher that gave engaging lectures and assignments.

Theme 2

📚 About Workload

  • Very repetitive and .
  • Each week required tons of reading, writing, and long lectures
  • way too much work as an online class

Theme 3

📈 About Grades

  • she is a
  • Easy class.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

11

Recent reviews read by the AI

12

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

There are 11 reviews with many recent detailed comments, though opinions are strongly polarized.

Inside 11 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 57
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 52

Course coverage

HIST017A4 reviews
HIST1013 reviews
HUM012 reviews
HIST2381 review
HISTORY11 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

9 reported outcomes

A range

7

A 5 · A- 2

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Rather not say 1