AI Rate Professor

De Anza College · Child Development & Education

Jila Malek

CD12 · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
56/100
RMP rating
3.4/5
Take again
33.33%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Take her if you value guidance and communication, but if you dislike mandatory participation or .

Best fit · Effort For RewardAccessible Outside ClassParticipation MattersCaring But PolarizingGroup ProjectsExtra Credit
  • Reviews are sharply split between very positive older comments and very negative newer comments.
  • Students praise her accessibility, communication, guidance, and .
  • The main risks are , and inconsistent lecture organization.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

An A is possible with guidance and , but , and mixed grading outcomes mean it is not effortless.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

The course content does not sound conceptually extreme, but poor structure, skipped text, and .

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with no online comparison.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

20/100

in-person reviews, and participation matters appears repeatedly.

, and there is no online evidence.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

48/100

and communication or reject her for weak class-time value and organization.

The recommendation and is highly polarized.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

52/100

Grades include A outcomes and , but one student reports a C- and high difficulty, so but not clearly lenient.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

45/100

Workload appears moderate to heavy because students mention many projects, participation, and detailed rubrics, though one review says it is not a lot of work.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews discuss workload.

Teaching experience

Average

58/100

Teaching quality is polarized, with praise for caring communication and guidance but complaints about bragging, weak lectures, and scattered text coverage.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

Balanced

45/100

The course appears to use projects, participation, and assessment.

Format shift

, and exam reviews; there is no online evidence.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are polarized, with strong praise for support and communication but , and class-time value.

Main concern

and if lectures are not useful.

What students said

“She guides you every step of the way and .”
CD12
“brags about herself 90% of of the class time”
CD12
“ .”
CD12

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

, but they do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, open-book rules, or .

Exam Reviews Mentioned

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, but they do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, open-book rules, or .

Exam Reviews Mentioned
“She also does reviews before exams which keeps all the info fresh in your mind.”
CD12

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She guides you every step of the way and .”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

58/100

“She makes learning so interesting and fun.”

👍 Recommendation Risk

48/100

“ !”

⚖️ Workload And Structure

45/100

“ ion the readings class time the first two weeks supported the !”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She has great communication with all students just as long as you reach out.
  • She makes learning so interesting and fun.
  • brags about herself 90% of of the class time

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty And Grades

  • Don't think the class is a lot of work.
  • She is very detailed on her syllabus and rubrics but it's so .
  • I would so if this werent a short 6 wk summer course!

Theme 3

🧭 About Class Rules

  • .
  • Yes
  • Participation matters

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is medium because there are only five reviews, they span many years, and the tone is consistent within each camp but strongly polarized.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

CD125 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C- 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1