AI Rate Professor

English As A Second Language

Michelle Marchiano

ESL262 · ESL5 · ESL272 · ESL26301D · ESL2623 · ESL61 · ESL263 · ESLESL · ESL236 · ESL252 · ESL273 · 56 lifetime ratings

AI rating
40/100
RMP rating
3.3/5
Take again
41.67%
Difficulty
4.1

The decision

if you want serious writing improvement and , and unclear expectations.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough GraderHeavy Writing LoadStrong FeedbackPolarizing TeachingStrict Expectations
  • Students consistently describe the class as hard, writing-heavy, and risky for GPA.
  • Positive reviews and can improve writing for motivated students.
  • , and feeling unsupported.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

Getting an A usually requires sustained effort, strong writing, and careful use of feedback, and many students say hard work still may not guarantee a high grade.

The only online review reports an A- with support, while and inconsistent.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

The course content is writing-heavy, reading-heavy, and demanding, especially for .

Online evidence describes clearer support, but nearly all in-person evidence describes difficult writing expectations.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

15/100

as mandatory, and participation or class presence appears important.

Both the single online review and as mandatory.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

42/100

Students recommend her when they want serious improvement, but many warn against taking her for GPA protection or .

The online review is positive, while in-person reviews are sharply split with .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

24/100

Students repeatedly call her a and .

Format shift

Online evidence is favorable but too small, while .

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Reviews mention lots of , and portfolio work.

Format shift

The online review focuses on feedback, while and reading work.

Teaching experience

Average

55/100

Her teaching is polarizing because some students report major improvement and .

Format shift

Online evidence is strongly positive, while and severe criticism.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Student , and quizzes more than formal exams.

Format shift

and quizzes, while online evidence does not clearly describe assessment structure.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

49 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews are highly polarized, with many and others praising real writing improvement.

Main concern

Strict grading and .

What students said

“I worked really hard but at the end I got a C.”
ESL273
“Difficult class but .”
ESL263
“Looking for an easy A? SORRY!”
ESL5

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

The single online review is strongly positive and , and support.

Main concern

The online evidence is too limited to prove consistency.

What students said

“What a great professor! Her instructions and .”
ESL262
“You should not miss her class if you want to improve your English!”
ESL262

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention quizzes, portfolios, and reflective essays, but they do not clearly prove proctoring, open-book rules, or a .

Quizzes MentionedPortfolio MentionedReflective Essay Risk

Assessment risk

Varies

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and reflective essay risks, but do not clearly prove proctoring or .

Daily QuizzesPortfolio RequirementReflective Essay Risk
“ .”
ESL272
“you still need work much harder on your portfolio”
ESL26301D
“I didn't pass the reflective essay.”
ESL61

Online

Online reviews .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Difficult class but .”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and recommendation tone. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

55/100

“She is strict, but you will learn what you're supposed to learn during her class- if you want to learn of course.”

⚖️

24/100

“I worked really hard but at the end I got a C.”

📚 Workload

25/100

“ ”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She is strict, but you will learn what you're supposed to learn during her class- if you want to learn of course.
  • Every class is group work, she rarely teaches anything but expects you to know.
  • Her instructions and .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Looking for an easy A? SORRY!
  • I worked really hard but at the end I got a C.
  • and don't grade properly.

Theme 3

❤️ About Support

  • She's at WRC room 3 days a week to help students.
  • She gives great feedbacks and if you let her know your problems!
  • She constantly gives her responses, and be there to help your writing and English improvement.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

56

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

The judgment is based on 50 reviews across many years with , and divided teaching experiences.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 524
4 out of 58
3 out of 54
2 out of 56
1 out of 514

Course coverage

ESL26318 reviews
ESL59 reviews
ESL2726 reviews
ESL2736 reviews
ESL2624 reviews
Show 6 more courses
ESL2522 reviews
ESL2361 review
ESL26231 review
ESL26301D1 review
ESL611 review
ESLESL1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

15 reported outcomes

A range

4

A 2 · A- 2

B range

2

B+ 1 · B 1

C range

3

C+ 1 · C 2

D range

3

D+ 2 · D- 1

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

2

Audit/No Grade 1 · Rather not say 1