AI Rate Professor

Accounting

Letha Jeanpierre

BASICACCT · ACCT1A · ACCT · BASICACCOUNTIN · ACCT1C · ACCT105 · ACCT1 · ACCOUNTINGBASI · 17 lifetime ratings

AI rating
48/100
RMP rating
2.5/5
Take again
75%
Difficulty
4.4

The decision

if you can handle heavy accounting work and prefer a structured effort-for-grade course.

Best fit · Effort For RewardHeavy WorkloadResponsive OnlineClear Grading in Recent ReviewsGroup ProjectsMixed Reputation
  • Recent online reviews are .
  • and reading matters.
  • and pull down confidence in the overall experience.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

A grades are realistic when students keep up with , and practice, but the workload is not light.

Online reviews support a clearer path to an A, while .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

36/100

Accounting concepts are manageable for prepared students, but and .

Online reviews describe structure and practice support, while harder than necessary.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

and in-person reviews marked optional and others marked mandatory.

Online attendance varies by review, and in-person .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

68/100

because she responds and gives a workable path, but older reviews are strongly negative.

Online reviews are mostly recommended, while in-person evidence is split and .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

and achievable A grades, but older reviews accuse her of being harsh or unclear.

Format shift

Online grading appears clearer than .

Workload

Heavy

24/100

Students repeatedly mention lots of , and several exams.

Format shift

Online reviews clearly describe weekly homework and projects, while .

Teaching experience

Average

52/100

Recent reviews describe her as responsive and helpful, but older reviews describe poor teaching and lack of care.

Format shift

Online teaching evidence is stronger and newer, while and more negative.

Assessment method

Balanced

62/100

The course uses homework, reading, discussion or participation, projects, midterms, and a final.

Format shift

Online reviews give the clearest assessment mix, while .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

11 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

review but many old reviews calling the teaching uncaring or ineffective.

Main concern

Older in-person comments question teaching quality and .

What students said

“Professor Jeanpierre is great.”
ACCT1A
“SHE MAKES IT HARDER THAN IT SHOULD BE!!”
ACCT1A
“All she does is preaches never really teaches.”
ACCT1C

Remote format

Online

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews are mostly positive and say the if students complete the work.

Main concern

The online workload is heavy, with , and exams.

What students said

“Lots of work, but .”
ACCT1A
“Online class was designed well”
ACCT1
“If you do the .”
ACCT1A

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

with midterms and a final, and reviews do not clearly prove strict online proctoring.

MidtermsFinal ExamMostly Multiple ChoiceOn-Campus FinalNo Clear Proctoring Evidence

Assessment risk

Standard

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, but do not clearly prove open-book, closed-book, or proctoring rules.

Written FinalHard Tests
“HW is asked to finish on computer, but the ”
ACCT105
“SHE MAKES IT HARDER THAN IT SHOULD BE!!”
ACCT1A

Online

, and an on-campus final, but do not clearly prove webcam, Lockdown Browser, or open-book rules.

MidtermsMostly Multiple ChoiceOn-Campus Final
“ .”
ACCT1A
“90% multiple choice. The .”
ACCT1A
“Purely online but .”
ACCT1A

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Can get A if u put in the work”

Voice snapshots generated from 17 reviews, , and teaching quality. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

52/100

“Online class was designed well”

📚 Workload

24/100

“ , and a final.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

68/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Professor Jeanpierre is great.
  • Quick responses you can tell she cares about her students even though its all online
  • All she does is preaches never really teaches.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • Can get A if u put in the work
  • Lots of work, but .
  • If you do the .

Theme 3

🧾 About Course Structure

  • Everything is on Cengage.
  • , and a final.
  • The .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

17

Recent reviews read by the AI

17

Lifetime ratings

66/100

Evidence confidence

There are 17 reviews, but and conflict with newer online reviews.

Inside 17 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 52
3 out of 51
2 out of 52
1 out of 58

Course coverage

ACCT1A7 reviews
ACCT13 reviews
ACCT2 reviews
ACCOUNTINGBASI1 review
ACCT1051 review
Show 3 more courses
ACCT1C1 review
BASICACCOUNTIN1 review
BASICACCT1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

6 reported outcomes

A range

4

A+ 2 · A 2

B range

1

B- 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not_Sure_Yet 1