AI Rate Professor

De Anza College · Humanities

Tanzeen Doha

HUM1 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
74/100
RMP rating
3.6/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
2.8

The decision

Take this professor if you are willing to attend and participate, because the and the better reviews are positive.

Best fit · Effort For RewardInteresting LecturesParticipation MattersGroup ProjectsClear Grading CriteriaMixed Clarity
  • Most recent , and a positive class experience.
  • Grades look reachable, with two reported A grades and one older student saying they still managed an A despite confusion.
  • Attendance and participation matter, and one older review says the class felt boring and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

Getting an A looks realistic because reported grades are strong and .

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

66/100

The course seems manageable overall, but participation, group projects, and .

All course difficulty evidence comes from in-person HUM1 reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

because one review lists it as mandatory and another says students have to go to class for board notes.

, and there is no online attendance evidence.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

82/100

, but the small sample and one negative older review limit confidence.

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

78/100

Grades appear favorable because both reported grades are A and one older student says they somehow managed an A.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

Workload looks moderate because students mention many group projects and .

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Good

72/100

Teaching is mostly praised as interesting and strong, but one older review describes confusion and boredom.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

Reviews mention group projects and participation, while .

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

and grading, but one older review reports confusion and boredom.

Main concern

Attendance and participation can matter a lot.

What students said

“Interesting lectures, , and participation was really important in this class.”
HUM1
“Tanzeen was a great professor!”
HUM1
“I barely understood what he was teaching.”
HUM1

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the .

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

format, proctoring rules, or .

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Interesting lectures, , and participation was really important in this class.”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 in-person reviews, highlighting key themes in , and attendance. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

72/100

“Tanzeen was a great professor!”

📈 Grade Friendliness

78/100

“I thought I was going to fail this class but somehow i managed to get an A. 8)”

⚠️ Main Concern

25/100

“You have to go to class to write down everything he writes on the board.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Interesting lectures, , and participation was really important in this class.
  • Tanzeen was a great professor!
  • great class; awesome lecture; interesting reader

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty And Grades

  • I thought I was going to fail this class but somehow i managed to get an A. 8)

Theme 3

⚠️ About Class Fit

  • I took this class not knowing what it was about, i was not interested in any of the stuff he taught.
  • Extremely boring 4 hours of my life.
  • I barely understood what he was teaching.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is limited by only four reviews, older dates, and sparse detail, but the format counts and broad themes are consistent.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 52
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

HUM14 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values