Is this an easy A?
FairEffort
55/100, but hard tests and disorganized teaching keep the A from being effortless.
Online evidence is mixed, while the but unclear lectures.
MATHD31 · D031 · MATH31 · PRECALCD031 · 4 lifetime ratings
The decision
Key questions
Is this an easy A?
Some grading sounds generous, especially full credit homework, but hard tests and disorganized teaching keep the A from being effortless.
Online evidence is mixed, while the single in-person review mentions flexible homework but unclear lectures.
Is the course easy?
The math feels harder because reviews mention theory-heavy tests, terminology, and confusing mixed material.
Online reviews provide most of the difficulty evidence, with one in-person review also noting confusing mixed material.
Is attendance flexible?
Reviews consistently say attendance is not mandatory or homework has no due dates.
Both online and in-person evidence support flexibility, though the dataset is small.
Is this professor recommended?
Three of four students would not take him again, mainly because of disorganized or unclear teaching.
Online evidence is split, while the single in-person review is not recommended.
Course guide
Grading
Fair
58/100
Homework can be flexible and sometimes full-credit, but tests are described as hard and grading can feel tough.
Format shift
Online evidence includes both tough tests and very generous homework credit, while the in-person review mentions second drafts on exams.
Workload
Heavy
35/100
Homework and quizzes can be frequent, and one review calls the homework very hard with many questions.
Format shift
Heavy workload evidence mostly comes from online reviews.
Teaching experience
Poor
45/100
Students describe him as caring in one review but often not confident, disorganized, or unable to explain clearly.
Format shift
Both online and in-person reviews mention confidence or organization concerns.
Assessment method
FocusOnExams
70/100
Reviews emphasize hard tests, exams, midterm, final, quizzes, and homework.
Format shift
Online reviews mention test-heavy structure, while the in-person review mentions second drafts on exams.
Luni fit check
Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.
Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.
Course format
Classroom format
Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro
The single in-person review says he wants students to succeed but lectures can be confusing and not confident.
Main concern
The only in-person review warns against him for students who need organized, clear math lectures.
What students said
“Doesnt seem very confident when teaching.”
“Homeworks have no due dates which gives you a lot of time to do them.”
Remote format
Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro
one student praised easy full-credit homework, while others found the class disorganized, hard, or test-heavy.
Main concern
No deadlines help flexibility but can make students fall behind.
What students said
“Tests were very hard and more theory based.”
“Great thing is he doesnt have due dates, but easy to fall behind”
“You get full credit for turning them in; it doesn't matter if you do it wrong; he still gives you full credit together with feedback.”
Exam style
Reviews mention hard or theory-based tests and second-draft exams, but no clear webcam, proctoring, open-book, or lockdown policy is proven.
Assessment risk
Standard
45/100
Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.
The single in-person review mentions second drafts on exams, but does not clearly prove exam format or proctoring rules.
“he gives chances on exams by having a 2nd draft.”
Online reviews mention hard theory-based tests and a reasonable midterm and final, with no clear evidence of proctoring or open-book rules.
“Tests were very hard and more theory based.”
“Midterm and Final are very reasonable.”
Student evidence
Top student voice
“Doesnt seem very confident when teaching.”
“Hes new. His thoughts are disorganized & hes still learning how to teach a class.”
“You get full credit for turning them in; it doesn't matter if you do it wrong; he still gives you full credit together with feedback.”
“Tests were very hard and more theory based.”
Theme 1
Theme 2
Theme 3
Data context
Analysis sample
4
Recent reviews read by the AI
4
Lifetime ratings
36/100
Evidence confidence
Only four reviews are available, and the opinions conflict sharply between one very positive review and several negative ones.
Inside 4 stored ratings
Reported outcomes
3 reported outcomes
A+ 1
No reported values
No reported values
No reported values
No reported values
Not sure yet 2