AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Edwin Njinimbam

MATH1C · MATH1A · 2A · 1C · DO42 · MATH43 · 1B · MATH1D · CALC1D · MATH41 · MATH42 · MATH011 · MATH1B · MATH114 · MATH2A · CALC1C · 373 lifetime ratings

AI rating
19/100
RMP rating
2.2/5
Take again
28.36%
Difficulty
3.9

The decision

Avoid unless you are strong at math and comfortable learning mostly on your own.

Best fit · Self Taught ProHard to understandSelf-study requiredTough graderTest heavyExtra credit
  • Most students describe unclear teaching, rude interactions, and .
  • Grades can be boosted by or easy online work, but and drops.
  • The biggest risk is not the math content alone, but and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

42/100

Some students report easy A outcomes through or online work, but many say tests are harsh and an A .

Online evidence is more grade-friendly, while and .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

The course feels challenging because , and often require students to learn from outside resources.

Online reviews mention easier grades, but and self-study.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

as not mandatory, but several in-person reviews say participation or .

, while in-person reviews are mixed.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

24/100

because they describe poor teaching, hard-to-follow lectures, and rude interactions.

Online has a few easy-grade recommendations, but .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

32/100

exists, but many students call him a and say tests are difficult or unlike examples.

Format shift

Online grading sounds easier in several reviews, while as strict.

Workload

Heavy

34/100

Students frequently mention lots of , and .

Format shift

Online reviews mention WebAssign and homework, while , and self-study.

Teaching experience

Poor

25/100

Most comments say for exams.

Format shift

Both formats report weak teaching, though a few older in-person and online reviews praise his help or insight.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

86/100

Reviews repeatedly describe the course as test-heavy with quizzes, exams, finals, and few graded components.

Format shift

Online and and quizzes as the .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

40 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are mostly negative, with , and self-study.

Main concern

Students report and poor lecture support.

What students said

“I literally taught myself.”
MATH43
“He doesn't give partial credit, and is particular about how you do a problem.”
MATH41
“Tests and .”
MATH42

Remote format

Online

10 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

Online reviews are split between very easy grades and very poor teaching quality.

Main concern

Students often still report and rude responses.

What students said

“if you want the freest A in .”
MATH2A
“If you .”
MATH1A
“ and were very hard even online.”
MATH1D

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

, but the and quizzes that students often say do not match lectures or homework.

Test HeavyQuizzesPop QuizzesTake-Home Group QuizzesExtra Credit Problems

Assessment risk

Varies

41/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews clearly mention , and , but do not prove closed-book policy.

Pop QuizzesTake-Home Group QuizzesExtra Credit ProblemsFinal Exam
“ of work, which I hated.”
CALC1D
“all but 1 quiz was take home and group work”
MATH114
“ and .”
1B

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove proctoring, webcam, Lockdown Browser, open-book, or closed-book policy.

Test HeavyHard Online TestsEasy Online Tests
“ and were very hard even online.”
MATH1D
“his online class ones were super easy.”
MATH1D

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you .”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and ; credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

25/100

“He doesn't actually teach he just does 5-6 practice problems and that's all.”

⚖️

32/100

“He doesn't give partial credit, and is particular about how you do a problem.”

👍 Recommendation Level

24/100

“ if you value your time and gpa”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • The lectures are two hours of practice problems with
  • His lecture is not clear at all, .
  • He doesn't teach.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • I wouldn't say it's impossible getting an A, but even a C is looking like a reach.
  • Gives tons of .
  • EASY A even though differential equation is not that easy.. just do your work.

Theme 3

🧪 About Exams

  • Tests and .
  • The only thing that was graded was the tests and quizzes.
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

373

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 50 reviews across several years show consistent patterns, though many reviews are old.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 551
4 out of 533
3 out of 550
2 out of 575
1 out of 5164

Course coverage

MATH4310 reviews
MATH1D8 reviews
MATH1C6 reviews
MATH425 reviews
2A3 reviews
Show 11 more courses
CALC1D3 reviews
MATH1B3 reviews
MATH2A3 reviews
MATH1142 reviews
1B1 review
1C1 review
CALC1C1 review
DO421 review
MATH0111 review
MATH1A1 review
MATH411 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

44 reported outcomes

A range

15

A+ 5 · A 10

B range

2

B+ 1 · B- 1

C range

6

C+ 2 · C 3 · C- 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

20

Drop/Withdrawal 4 · Incomplete 4 · Not sure yet 10 · Rather not say 2