AI Rate Professor

Fine Arts

Motosuke Ohtake

ART37A · ARTS10A · ART10A · ART58 · 15 lifetime ratings

AI rating
55/100
RMP rating
3.6/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
2.7

The decision

Take him if you can handle open-ended art projects and want feedback, but if .

Best fit · Effort For RewardHelpful FeedbackVague GradingProject HeavyAttendance MattersHands-Off Teaching
  • Students often describe him as knowledgeable and willing to help.
  • The main complaints , and long or boring lectures.
  • Grades seem manageable, but strong results require time management and steady project work.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

54/100

A or B is realistic, but students say an A takes steady work, time management, and project revisions.

because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

62/100

The course content is not described as conceptually hard, but vague requirements and .

because there are no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

Several reviews say attendance is mandatory or that skipping class can make passing difficult.

because there are no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

58/100

and feedback, but hesitate because of vague structure and uneven lectures.

because there are no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

and feedback, but students still call it vague and say an A takes work.

Format shift

because there are no online reviews.

Workload

Heavy

35/100

Projects are repeatedly described as .

Format shift

because there are no online reviews.

Teaching experience

Good

67/100

He is often seen as knowledgeable, helpful, and caring, but also vague, unstructured, and sometimes boring.

Format shift

because there are no online reviews.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

, and portfolios as the main graded work.

Format shift

because there are no online reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

15 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

but often vague professor whose courses reward consistent project effort.

Main concern

Students , and time-consuming projects.

What students said

“He is a knowledgeable professor and cares about your works and always ready to help.”
ARTS10A
“The ”
ARTS10A
“You have to work hard for an A.”
ARTS10A

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention one quiz and many projects, but do not .

One Quiz MentionedProject-Based AssessmentExam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and , but exam rules are not clearly proven.

One Quiz MentionedProject-Based AssessmentExam Policy Not Clearly Proven
“1 Quiz 3 Projects (Toothpicks/ConstructionPaper/FoundObjects) 3 Critiques/Presentations”
ART10A

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“He is a great design instructor with a ton of real world experience.”

Voice snapshots generated from 15 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and attendance; credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

67/100

“He is a knowledgeable professor and cares about your works and always ready to help.”

⚖️

58/100

“He's a though, otherwise easy B.”

📌 Workload Reality

35/100

“The ”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • .
  • He is a great design instructor with a ton of real world experience.
  • Moto did not lecture at all about sculpture.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • You have to work hard for an A.
  • if you want to re-do your project you can for a better grade.
  • ....

Theme 3

⏱️ About Workload and Attendance

  • !
  • The
  • Manage your time wisely and think outside the box.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

15

Recent reviews read by the AI

15

Lifetime ratings

72/100

Evidence confidence

The dataset has 15 reviews over many years with consistent themes, but many older reviews lack grades and recommendation data.

Inside 15 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 55
3 out of 54
2 out of 52
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ARTS10A7 reviews
ART10A4 reviews
ART37A3 reviews
ART581 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

3

A+ 1 · A 2

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values