AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Joan Parrish

MATH1C · STATISTICS · CALC1B · MATH1A · MATH2B · MATHD011 · MATH43 · MATH11 · MATH41 · MATH42 · MATH10 · MATH12 · MATH1B · 62 lifetime ratings

AI rating
29/100
RMP rating
2.9/5
Take again
37.84%
Difficulty
3.8

The decision

Take Joan Parrish only if you want structure and depth and can handle heavy weekly work and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerHeavy HomeworkTough GraderTest HeavyCaring But PolarizingAttendance Matters
  • , and difficult exams.
  • Positive , and builds a strong math foundation.
  • Getting an A is possible, but , and extra help.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

An A is possible, but students usually describe it as , and office-hour support.

The only online review says grading is harsh, while but only with steady effort.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

The math content itself is often hard, and students say class.

Online evidence is too thin, while and demanding course material.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

as required or warn that skipping class makes passing unlikely.

The online review marks attendance mandatory, and .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

38/100

Recommendations are split, but the dominant warning is to avoid her if , and .

The online review does not recommend her, while and some strong praise.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

20/100

Students often and and exams very strictly.

Format shift

The online review directly calls her a , and in-person reviews repeat the same concern across many courses.

Workload

Overwhelming

18/100

students describing hours of work each week.

Format shift

The , and in-person reviews repeatedly describe excessive homework.

Teaching experience

Average

45/100

Her teaching is polarizing because some students praise her care and clarity while .

Format shift

Online evidence is negative, while but detailed enough to show a polarized pattern.

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

, and finals rather than one single assessment type.

Format shift

Online evidence emphasizes homework, while , and finals.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

49 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews are highly polarized, with , and picky grading, balanced by praise for caring support.

Main concern

The workload and .

What students said

“ AND THE MIDTERMS WERE SO BRUTAL.”
MATH12
“She assigns a decent amount of homework, but nothing too difficult.”
MATH1B

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

The single online review is and lecture-heavy pacing.

Main concern

and required attendance make the online evidence risky.

What students said

“She is such a !!”
MATH12

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

, and , but they do not clearly prove open-book rules or proctoring policy.

Hard ExamsPicky GradingTest HeavyShort Test Time

Assessment risk

Strict

32/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and midterms, but do not clearly prove book policy or .

Hard MidtermsBrutal FinalTest Heavy
“the quizzes and so hard”
MATH12
“ .”
MATH1A

Online

The online review does not clearly prove .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Do yourself a favor and if you have other options.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and exams. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

45/100

“ . .”

⚖️

20/100

“She grades so harshly and only gives an hour for a test”

📚 Workload Pressure

18/100

“She assigns hw like we have nothing else to do in our lives.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Her lectures are really straight forward and she's willing to answer any questions you have thoroughly.
  • overwhelmingly amount of hw.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • -Show up to class, every class -Do the hw
  • and open to any questions. There is too much hw and it takes up 4 hours or more.

Theme 3

🧪 About Exams

  • AND THE MIDTERMS WERE SO BRUTAL.
  • The

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

62

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

The analysis uses 50 reviews across several years with , and polarized teaching quality.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 517
4 out of 57
3 out of 512
2 out of 512
1 out of 514

Course coverage

MATH1B9 reviews
MATH418 reviews
MATH1A7 reviews
MATH426 reviews
MATH115 reviews
Show 8 more courses
MATH125 reviews
CALC1B2 reviews
MATH102 reviews
MATH432 reviews
MATH1C1 review
MATH2B1 review
MATHD0111 review
STATISTICS1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

30 reported outcomes

A range

14

A+ 2 · A 9 · A- 3

B range

7

B+ 1 · B 3 · B- 3

C range

2

C+ 1 · C 1

D range

2

D+ 1 · D 1

F

3

F 3

No letter grade reported

2

Drop/Withdrawal 2